期刊名称：FASEB JOURNAL
 期刊简介(About the journal)
投稿须知(Instructions to Authors)
编辑部信息(Editorial Board)
About the journal
|
FJ Online contains the full content of each monthly issue of the journal and FJ Express articles which are not available in print. The online full text is searchable by keyword, and the cited references include hyperlinks to Medline and to the full text of many other online journals. Please note that meeting abstracts, typically published for Experimental Biology (EB), are not posted online.
Online full-text content begins with the January 1998 issue, and will expand with each month's new issues. Abstracts are online beginning with the journal's first issue, July 1987 issue.
Each print issue will be placed online on the date it is mailed to subscribers, or the first day of the issue month, whichever comes first. The online site may be days or even weeks ahead of your receipt of the print edition. FJ Express articles are posted online within weeks of acceptance.
The table of contents of upcoming issues will regularly be placed online as a future table of contents.
The Web site also provides access to information about the journal (e.g., Instructions to Authors, the journal's Editorial Board, and subscription information including online ordering), as well as access to other services.
We encourage you, on your first visit to the site, to sign the guestbook. This will take only a minute or two, and will give us helpful information about who the online readers are, and how they are connecting to us. We would appreciate your comments, critiques, questions, or suggestions; these can be sent via the Feedback button found on all pages of the site. Feedback will help us decide what new site features would be most valuable and how well the site is working for you.
The site is being produced in conjunction with Stanford University's HighWire Press.
|
|
Instructions to Authors
The FASEB Journal is now accepting submissions electronically. If this is the first time you are using the online submission site, or you would like to review our procedures, please see our online submission information page for an overview. Authors should also review our editorial policies.
Getting Started: IQ and Manuscript Preparation
Technical requirements for IQ preparation Authors interested in submitting work to The FASEB Journal must submit an Initial Query (IQ). This page contains a checklist of items needed to complete the online IQ.
Technical requirements for IQ preparation
Authors interested in submitting an article for The FASEB Journal must send an Initial Query (IQ) to the journal. After the initial review, you will receive an e-mail indicating whether you should submit the entire manuscript for formal review. The system will not allow you to submit a manuscript without an IQ.
There are four types of articles that The FASEB Journal publishes: Research Communications (both FJ Express and traditional pubication), Reviews, Hypotheses, and Life Sciences Forum. You'll need to designate which kind of article for which you are sending your IQ.
Research Communications
The FASEB Journal seeks to publish Research Communications that integrate one or more disciplines--preferably those that apply molecular biological methods, along with functional studies, to the study of biological questions that bear on developmental biology, pathophysiology, or molecular medicine.
To complete the IQ, you will need:
- A cover letter describing the findings in your proposed paper
- An abstract of no more than 200 words that states the purpose(s) of the study or investigation, basic procedures [selection of study subjects or laboratory animals; observational and analytic method(s)], main findings, and the principal conclusions
- A title and a complete list of authors
- Answers to the following questions:
- What was the original aim of the study?
- What are the most significant, novel findings?
- How do these findings relate to the state of the field?
- Why are these findings appropriate for The FASEB Journal?
Reviews
The FASEB Journal seeks to publish Review articles that collect, collate, and compare observations on a topic of broad interest to the readership of the Journal. The ideal Review should be accurate scientifically; describe the most relevant and recent contributions; be fair in its appraisal of the significance of the studies cited; and be generous in the choice of citations, giving equal notice to contributions from both collaborators and competitors, and consider the work published throughout the international community.
To complete the IQ, you will need:
- A cover letter describing the focus of your proposed paper
- An abstract of no more than 200 words that should arouse the readers' interest, be written for a general readership, and be free from jargon
- A title and a complete list of authors
- Schematic illustration(s) that depict the most important points that are described in the body of the text. These illustrations should be attached to an e-mail sent directly to faseb@yale.edu after submitting your IQ. Please reference your IQ's ID number in the subject line of your message. If you have questions about these illustrations, please contact the Editorial Office at faseb@yale.edu
We have recently adopted a new approach to reviews for the Journal, and now require that every manuscript be accompanied by schematic illustrations. We feel that many of our readers will benefit more if the material is clearly illustrated by high quality diagrams, which they may also use for teaching.
Examples of schematic illustrations can be seen in figures from Fogli et al. (The FASEB Journal. 2004;18:664-675.) [Figure 1] [Figure 2] [Figure 3] [Figure 4]
Because we regard this as a high priority, we now require all potential authors of reviews to submit to us copies of all the illustrations that will appear in the article before sending us the final manuscript.
Hypotheses
The FASEB Journal seeks to publish Hypotheses that are accessible and interesting to the readership of the journal and that provide an interpretative overview of the most significant new findings of the subject under consideration. The ideal Hypotheses should be accurate scientifically, describe a hypothesis which is both novel and relevant in the context of the most recent scholarship, and be experimentally verifiable.
To complete the IQ, you will need:
- A cover letter describing the focus of your proposed paper
- An abstract of no more than 200 words that should state biological questions being addressed and include a brief summary of the proposed hypothesis
- A title and a complete list of authors
Life Science Forum
Space in The FASEB Journal has been reserved for the publication of original commentaries that deal with a broad range of issues that impact on the life sciences. These might include but are not limited to discussions of governmental policies related to research funding and regulation, the impact of scientific research on higher education, economic or social implications of scientific advances, and the mechanisms now in place for the allocation of research support and peer-reviewed publication of research findings.
To complete the IQ, you will need:
- A cover letter describing the focus of your proposed paper
- An abstract of no more than 200 words
- A title and a complete list of authors
Technical requirements for manuscript preparation After the initial review, authors will receive a reply indicating whether they should submit the entire manuscript for formal review. This page contains specifications for text and figure preparation.
Technical requirements for manuscript preparation
Manuscripts should be submitted only after initial review of an Initial Query (IQ). Please see Technical requirements for IQ preparation for more information.
After you've been invited to submit a manuscript, you'll need to prepare a series of files to upload for submission. Follow the links below for a description of these files based on article type.
Research Communications: FJ Express
FJ Express
|
FJ Express is an innovative approach to the rapid publication of research communications in The FASEB Journal.
Manuscripts accepted for this format will be published online, in full text, in The FASEB Journal approximately six weeks after acceptance and receipt of copyright forms. These peer-reviewed, edited articles will be the version of record for citation purposes; fully searchable, and indexed in Index Medicus, Medline, PubMed, and other services.
There have been a number of issues raised by authors and publishers regarding how citations to the The FASEB Journal are handled by Thomson ISI. As a result there has been an ongoing dialog between FASEB staff and Thomson ISI regarding these issues. Please see the letter from Thomson ISI for more information.
In addition to the online version of the full-length manuscript, a three-page summary of each article, written by the author, will be published in The FASEB Journal a few months later.
Here's what you'll need to complete your submission:
Suggested reviewers. You will need to provide the names of five potential referees who can provide expert and impartial assessment of the work. To ensure timely review, authors should provide addresses, telephone and fax numbers, and e-mail addresses of suggested referees.
‡Summary
The summary is limited to 3 printed pages in the journal. If, at the proof stage of production, the summary exceeds three pages, authors will be asked to delete enough material to fit the requisite three pages.
Summary manuscript. The text must be no longer than 2,000 words (based on average figure size). Please include:
- Specific aims (include subtitles for each section): One or two sentences, maximum
- Principal findings: These should be numbered and listed individually
- Conclusions and significance: Explain how the findings add to the subject under investigation. Do they support or contradict prevailing views? What questions/issues remain unresolved?
An abstract, acknowledgement, and reference list should not be included as part of the summary, as they will have already appeared in the full-length version.
Schematic diagram. A schematic diagram is required for each FJ Express summary. This diagram should summarize graphically what was discovered, and it should also reflect the author's interpretation of those findings. This schematic figure will not count as one of the results figures. The schematic diagram can be one of three types, chosen and prepared by the author. Click on the type to see a published example. Prepare the schematic as a file saved as a GIF, JPEG, TIFF, EPS, PPT, and PDF. File resolutions of 72 dpi will create the most readable figures for reviewers.
Formats not supported include the following:
• Any file utilizing OLE (Object Linking and Embedding) technology to display information or embed files.
• Bitmap (.bmp), PICT (.pict), Excel (.xls), Photoshop (.psd), Canvas (.cnv), CorelDRAW (.cdr), and locked or encrypted PDFs.
• Multi-page PowerPoint files (.ppt) are not supported; PowerPoint files with one slide per file are acceptable.
If your paper is accepted for publication, a high-resolution TIFF, EPS, or PPT will be requested for publication-quality figures.
Type I:
A word-based schematic containing blocks of text that are linked together. It may be supplemented by a brief legend or stand alone.
Type II:
A simple line drawing that simulates biological structures. This type uses both words and minimal figure drawings to summarize results. Some text may be needed to guide the reader.
Type III:
An artistic rendition that simulates the biological process being described. A legend may be needed to supplement the image. A figure of this quality, which could be multicolored, has many advantages: It attracts the attention of readers, it may be copied for teaching, or it may be reproduced in other publications.
Other figures. You may include one or two figures or a table from the full-length manuscript (see below) to document the most significant findings. The figures used must be the same as in the original manuscript. A single figure in the full-length manuscript equals one figure in the summary. Composite figures are not acceptable, although some kinds of deletions are allowable.
Prepare each figure as a separate file saved as a GIF, JPEG, TIFF, EPS, PPT, and PDF. File resolutions of 72 dpi will create the most readable figures for reviewers. For tables, the system accepts most common word processing formats (such as MS Word and Word Perfect).
Formats not supported include the following:
• Any file utilizing OLE (Object Linking and Embedding) technology to display information or embed files.
• Bitmap (.bmp), PICT (.pict), Excel (.xls), Photoshop (.psd), Canvas (.cnv), CorelDRAW (.cdr), and locked or encrypted PDFs.
• Multi-page PowerPoint files (.ppt) are not supported; PowerPoint files with one slide per file are acceptable.
If your paper is accepted for publication, high-resolution TIFF, EPS, or PPT will be requested for publication-quality figures.
Supplemental files. Files such as videos or lengthy appendices that do not appear in the print version of the article can be uploaded as supplemental files online. Below is the partial list of file types that we can post. If your file type is not represented here, please contact meig@faseb.org to see if your file type is supported.
File Types
Description, Suffix
Plain Text, txt
HTML Page, html
JPEG Image, jpg
GIF Image, gif
QuickTime Video, mov
MPEG Movie, mpg
Microsoft AVI Video, avi
Adobe PDF, pdf
Microsoft Excel Spread, xls
ZIP Compressed File, zip
RealMedia File, rm
Tiff Image, tif
PowerPoint, ppt
Encapsulated Postscript, eps
‡Full-length manuscript
Manuscript. Full-length manuscripts for FJ Express articles must be no longer than 8,000 words including abstract and references. Manuscripts should be written in concise, logical, and grammatically correct English. Standard nomenclature should be used; define terms at first mention. Every effort should be made to be brief, short of skipping essential data or methods.
The text should be divided into sections with the headings: Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion. Long articles may need subheadings within some sections to clarify their content, especially the Results and Discussion sections. The Introduction briefly summarizes the background of the research to be reported and should elaborate any theoretical background to the design of the experiments; it should not summarize the data.
The Methods section is an important part of a full paper. It should contain the experimental protocols and describe the origin of any unusual or special materials, tissue, cell lines, or organisms. It is appropriate in this section to provide data to support the identity or purity of reagents, the reliability of methods, the sensitivity of an instrument, or the essential features of a genotype. Authors should put most of the experimental detail into the Methods section, leaving the Results section for exposition of the experimental design and results.
The Results section should present, in logical order, the experiments that support the conclusions to be drawn later in the Discussion. Particular care should be taken in the Results section to state results exactly; this is not the place for interpretations, extended lines or inference, arguments or speculations. The Discussion section, in contrast, is intended to allow the authors to propose their interpretation of their results and to suggest what they might mean in a larger context.
Use a common word processing program such as MS Word or WordPerfect to prepare the file. Use Times or Symbol fonts. Left-justify the text and turn off automatic end-of-line hypenation. Use carriage returns only to end headings and paragraphs, not to break lines. Do not insert spaces before punctuation. Use consistent notations and spellings.
Images. Prepare each figure as a separate file saved as a GIF, JPEG, TIFF, EPS, PPT, and PDF. File resolutions of 72 dpi will create the most readable figures for reviewers. For tables, the system accepts most common word processing formats (such as MS Word and Word Perfect).
Formats not supported include the following:
• Any file utilizing OLE (Object Linking and Embedding) technology to display information or embed files.
• Bitmap (.bmp), PICT (.pict), Excel (.xls), Photoshop (.psd), Canvas (.cnv), CorelDRAW (.cdr), and locked or encrypted PDFs.
• Multi-page PowerPoint files (.ppt) are not supported; PowerPoint files with one slide per file are acceptable.
If your paper is accepted for publication, high-resolution TIFF, EPS, or PPT will be requested for publication-quality figures. |
Research Communications: traditional publication
Research Communications
Here is what you'll need to complete your manuscript submission:
Suggested reviewers. You will need to provide the names of five potential referees who can provide expert and impartial assessment of the work. To ensure timely review, authors should provide addresses, telephone and fax numbers, and e-mail addresses of suggested referees.
Manuscript. Research Communication articles must be no longer than 8,000 words including abstract and references. Manuscripts should be written in concise, logical, and grammatically correct English. Standard nomenclature should be used; define terms at first mention. Every effort should be made to be brief, short of skipping essential data or methods.
The text should be divided into sections with the headings: Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion. Long articles may need subheadings within some sections to clarify their content, especially the Results and Discussion sections. The Introduction briefly summarizes the background of the research to be reported and should elaborate any theoretical background to the design of the experiments; it should not summarize the data.
The Methods section is an important part of a full paper. It should contain the experimental protocols and describe the origin of any unusual or special materials, tissue, cell lines, or organisms. It is appropriate in this section to provide data to support the identity or purity of reagents, the reliability of methods, the sensitivity of an instrument, or the essential features of a genotype. Authors should put most of the experimental detail into the Methods section, leaving the Results section for exposition of the experimental design and results.
The Results section should present, in logical order, the experiments that support the conclusions to be drawn later in the Discussion. Particular care should be taken in the Results section to state results exactly; this is not the place for interpretations, extended lines or inference, arguments or speculations. The Discussion section, in contrast, is intended to allow the authors to propose their interpretation of their results and to suggest what they might mean in a larger context.
Use a common word processing program such as MS Word or WordPerfect to prepare the file. Use Times or Symbol fonts. Left-justify the text and turn off automatic end-of-line hypenation. Use carriage returns only to end headings and paragraphs, not to break lines. Do not insert spaces before punctuation. Use consistent notations and spellings.
Images. Prepare each figure as a separate file saved as a GIF, JPEG, TIFF, EPS, PPT, and PDF. File resolutions of 72 dpi will create the most readable figures for reviewers. For tables, the system accepts most common word processing formats (such as MS Word and Word Perfect).
Formats not supported include the following:
• Any file utilizing OLE (Object Linking and Embedding) technology to display information or embed files.
• Bitmap (.bmp), PICT (.pict), Excel (.xls), Photoshop (.psd), Canvas (.cnv), CorelDRAW (.cdr), and locked or encrypted PDFs.
• Multi-page PowerPoint files (.ppt) are not supported; PowerPoint files with one slide per file are acceptable.
If your paper is accepted for publication, high-resolution TIFF, EPS, or PPT will be requested for publication-quality figures.
Supplemental files. Files such as videos or lengthy appendices that do not appear in the print version of the article can be uploaded as supplemental files online. Below is the partial list of file types that we can post. If your file type is not represented here, please contact meig@faseb.org to see if your file type is supported.
File Types
Description, Suffix
Plain Text, txt
HTML Page, html
JPEG Image, jpg
GIF Image, gif
QuickTime Video, mov
MPEG Movie, mpg
Microsoft AVI Video, avi
Adobe PDF, pdf
Microsoft Excel Spread, xls
ZIP Compressed File, zip
RealMedia File, rm
Tiff Image, tif
PowerPoint, ppt
Encapsulated Postscript, eps
Hypotheses
Hypotheses
Here is what you'll need to complete your manuscript submission:
Suggested reviewers. You will need to provide the names of four potential referees who can provide expert and impartial assessment of the work. To ensure timely review, authors should provide addresses, telephone and fax numbers, and e-mail addresses of suggested referees.
Manuscript. Hypotheses must be no longer than 4,000 words including abstract and references. Manuscripts should be written in concise, logical, and grammatically correct English. Standard nomenclature should be used; define terms at first mention. Every effort should be made to be brief, short of skipping essential information.
Use a common word processing program such as MS Word or WordPerfect to prepare the file. Use Times or Symbol fonts. Left-justify the text and turn off automatic end-of-line hypenation. Use carriage returns only to end headings and paragraphs, not to break lines. Do not insert spaces before punctuation. Use consistent notations and spellings.
Figures. Prepare each figure as a separate file saved as a GIF, JPEG, TIFF, EPS, PPT, and PDF. File resolutions of 72 dpi will create the most readable figures for reviewers. For tables, the system accepts most common word processing formats (such as MS Word and Word Perfect).
Formats not supported include the following:
• Any file utilizing OLE (Object Linking and Embedding) technology to display information or embed files.
• Bitmap (.bmp), PICT (.pict), Excel (.xls), Photoshop (.psd), Canvas (.cnv), CorelDRAW (.cdr), and locked or encrypted PDFs.
• Multi-page PowerPoint files (.ppt) are not supported; PowerPoint files with one slide per file are acceptable.
If your paper is accepted for publication, high-resolution TIFF, EPS, or PPT will be requested for publication-quality figures.
Supplemental files. Files such as videos or lengthy appendices that do not appear in the print version of the article can be uploaded as supplemental files online. Below is the partial list of file types that we can post. If your file type is not represented here, please contact meig@faseb.org to see if your file type is supported.
File Types
Description, Suffix
Plain Text, txt
HTML Page, html
JPEG Image, jpg
GIF Image, gif
QuickTime Video, mov
MPEG Movie, mpg
Microsoft AVI Video, avi
Adobe PDF, pdf
Microsoft Excel Spread, xls
ZIP Compressed File, zip
RealMedia File, rm
Tiff Image, tif
PowerPoint, ppt
Encapsulated Postscript, eps
Reviews
Reviews
Here is what you'll need to complete your manuscript submission:
Suggested reviewers. You will need to provide the names of four potential referees who can provide expert and impartial assessment of the work. To ensure timely review, authors should provide addresses, telephone and fax numbers, and e-mail addresses of suggested referees.
Manuscript. Review articles must be no longer than 10,000 words, including the abstract, and up to 100 references. Manuscripts should be written in concise, logical, and grammatically correct English. Standard nomenclature should be used; define terms at first mention. Every effort should be made to be brief, short of skipping essential information.
The text is usually, but not necessarily, divided into sections with the headings: Background; Recent Results; Matters of Controversy/Unanswered Questions; and Prospects and Predictions. The bulk of the review should focus on recent findings (within the last one to two years), with the most attention given to results that break new ground or provide new interpretations of existing dogma. Matters of controversy and unanswered questions should not be overlooked. Reviewers should also take the opportunity to speculate on the most fruitful directions for future research, possibly even offering predictions of experiments now in progress, either their own or others.
Use a common word processing program such as MS Word or WordPerfect to prepare the file. Use Times or Symbol fonts. Left-justify the text and turn off automatic end-of-line hypenation. Use carriage returns only to end headings and paragraphs, not to break lines. Do not insert spaces before punctuation. Use consistent notations and spellings.
Images. Prepare each figure as a separate file saved as a GIF, JPEG, TIFF, EPS, PPT, and PDF. File resolutions of 72 dpi will create the most readable figures for reviewers. For tables, the system accepts most common word processing formats (such as MS Word and Word Perfect).
Formats not supported include the following:
• Any file utilizing OLE (Object Linking and Embedding) technology to display information or embed files.
• Bitmap (.bmp), PICT (.pict), Excel (.xls), Photoshop (.psd), Canvas (.cnv), CorelDRAW (.cdr), and locked or encrypted PDFs.
• Multi-page PowerPoint files (.ppt) are not supported; PowerPoint files with one slide per file are acceptable.
If your paper is accepted for publication, high-resolution TIFF, EPS, or PPT will be requested for publication-quality figures.
Supplemental files. Files such as videos or lengthy appendices that do not appear in the print version of the article can be uploaded as supplemental files online. Below is the partial list of file types that we can post. If your file type is not represented here, please contact meig@faseb.org to see if your file type is supported.
File Types
Description, Suffix
Plain Text, txt
HTML Page, html
JPEG Image, jpg
GIF Image, gif
QuickTime Video, mov
MPEG Movie, mpg
Microsoft AVI Video, avi
Adobe PDF, pdf
Microsoft Excel Spread, xls
ZIP Compressed File, zip
RealMedia File, rm
Tiff Image, tif
PowerPoint, ppt
Encapsulated Postscript, eps
Life Sciences Forum
Life Sciences Forum
Here is what you'll need to complete your manuscript submission:
Suggested reviewers. You will need to provide the names of four potential referees who can provide expert and impartial assessment of the work. To ensure timely review, authors should provide addresses, telephone and fax numbers, and e-mail addresses of suggested referees.
Manuscript. Life Sciences Forum articles should be written in concise, logical, and grammatically correct English. Standard nomenclature should be used; define terms at first mention. Every effort should be made to be brief, short of skipping essential information.
Use a common word processing program such as MS Word or WordPerfect to prepare the file. Use Times or Symbol fonts. Left-justify the text and turn off automatic end-of-line hypenation. Use carriage returns only to end headings and paragraphs, not to break lines. Do not insert spaces before punctuation. Use consistent notations and spellings.
Images. Prepare Prepare each figure as a separate file saved as a GIF, JPEG, TIFF, EPS, PPT, and PDF. File resolutions of 72 dpi will create the most readable figures for reviewers. For tables, the system accepts most common word processing formats (such as MS Word and Word Perfect).
Formats not supported include the following:
• Any file utilizing OLE (Object Linking and Embedding) technology to display information or embed files.
• Bitmap (.bmp), PICT (.pict), Excel (.xls), Photoshop (.psd), Canvas (.cnv), CorelDRAW (.cdr), and locked or encrypted PDFs.
• Multi-page PowerPoint files (.ppt) are not supported; PowerPoint files with one slide per file are acceptable.
If your paper is accepted for publication, high-resolution TIFF, EPS, or PPT will be requested for publication-quality figures.
Supplemental files. Files such as videos or lengthy appendices that do not appear in the print version of the article can be uploaded as supplemental files online. Below is the partial list of file types that we can post. If your file type is not represented here, please contact meig@faseb.org to see if your file type is supported.
File Types
Description, Suffix
Plain Text, txt
HTML Page, html
JPEG Image, jpg
GIF Image, gif
QuickTime Video, mov
MPEG Movie, mpg
Microsoft AVI Video, avi
Adobe PDF, pdf
Microsoft Excel Spread, xls
ZIP Compressed File, zip
RealMedia File, rm
Tiff Image, tif
PowerPoint, ppt
Encapsulated Postscript, eps
Finalizing your manuscript for publication Authors whose manuscripts have been accepted for publication will need to provide hard copy, publication-quality figures, and signed forms to the production office.
Finalizing your manuscript for publication
Before we can schedule your manuscript for publication, we must receive the following materials:
1. A hard copy of the final version of your full manuscript, tables, and publication-quality figures.
2. A disk (floppy, CD, or zip) containing the manuscript, figure legends, and tables (MS Word, WordPerfect, or RTF) and publication-quality electronic versions of the figures (*.eps, *.tif, or *.ppt only). Please see figure specifications for details on image preparation. Do not embed figures in the manuscript file.
3. A copyright form signed by ALL of the authors.
4. A manuscript on disk form signed by the corresponding author.
5. A page and color charge agreement signed by the corresponding author.
In addition, if you are submitting an FJ Express article, send:
6. A hard copy of the summary (i.e. the short version for print publication), tables, and publication-quality figures.
7. A SEPARATE disk (floppy, CD, or zip) containing the manuscript and all tables (MS Word, WordPerfect, or RTF) and electronic versions of the figures (*.eps, *.tif, or *.ppt only). Please be sure to save to the disk the schematic diagram as well as the one or two figures from your full length manuscript. Please read technical requirements for FJ Express for details.
Please send these via express mail to ensure timely receipt to:
Lynn Willis
Senior Editor
The FASEB Journal
Lee Building, Room 1503
9650 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, MD, 20814-3998
Your manuscript will then be scheduled for the next available issue. You will receive an e-mail message when page proofs are available for your review. The month of publication will appear at the bottom of the page proofs. You will also receive page charge and offprint order forms with your page proofs. Current page charges and color costs are available on our website.
**If you submit an FJ Express article, you will receive proofs for your full online manuscript separately from your summary print manuscript.
If you have any questions regarding the preparation of your manuscript or the publication of your work, please contact Lynn Willis by phone at 301-634-7104 or by e-mail at lwillis@faseb.org.
Register with Our Website and Submit Materials
Register If this is the first time you are using this site, you will need to register. If you have registered before, but forgotten your password, you can have a new password sent by email.
Update registration information Sign on and change your contact information or password.
Submit Sign on and begin (or resume) a submission.
If you encounter any problems, please send a message to the Editorial Office at faseb@yale.edu or call 203-737-2334.
Editorial Board
| Editor-in-Chief |
|
Gerald Weissmann, MD
Editor-in-Chief
New York University
|
| Associate Editors |
|
Helen Blau, PhD
Stanford University
Robert D. Goldman, PhD
Northwestern University
Robert Haselkorn, PhD
University of Chicago
Leslie Vosshall, PhD
Rockefeller Univeristy
|
Book Review Editors |
|
Susan Longhito
Paideia Communications, Inc.
Thoru Pederson
University of Massachusetts Medical School
|
| Special Projects Editor |
|
John R. David
Harvard University
|
| Fine Arts Editor |
|
Ann Weissmann
MBL/WHOI Library
|
Editorial Board |
|
Paul Joseph Anderson
Baccio Baccetti
Kim E.Barrett (APS)
Etienne E. Baulieu
Edward A. Berger
David H. Bernanke (AAA)
Martin J. Blaser
Gary G. Borisy
Ann Campbell Burke (SDB)
Jean Pierre Changeux
John R. David
Betty Diamond (AAI)
Glenn I. Fishman
Clara Franzini-Armstrong
Vladimir Gelfand
Godfrey Getz
Edward J. Goetzl
David P. Goldenberg (Protein)
Laura T. Goldsmith
Peter J. Hansen (SSR)
Carrie Haskell-Luevano (ApepS)
Rochelle Hirschhorn (ASGH)
Paul Insel (ASPET)
Kenneth S. Korach (ENDO)
Sir Peter Lachmann
Richard I. Levin
Arnold J. Levine
Pier Francesco Mannaioni
George M. Martin
Christopher K. Mathews (ASBMB)
Salvador Moncada
Jon S. Morrow (ASIP)
Krzysztof Palczewski
Thoru Pederson
Mark Reid Philips
Edgar Pick
Burkhard Rost (ISCB)
Abdulla K. Salahudeen (AFMR)
Charles N. Serhan
Takao Shimizu
Sarah Spiegel
Nina S. Stachenfeld (ASCM)
Joann Sweasy (EMS)
Glauco P. Tocchini-Valentini
Babette B. Weksler
John Wysolmerski (ASBMR)
Anthony T. Yeung (ABRF)
Steven H. Zeisel (ASN)
|
Office of Publications |
|
The FASEB Journal
9650 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, MD 20814-3998, USA
Phone: 301-634-7100; Fax: 301-634-7809
journals@faseb.org
Director of Publications
Jennifer L. Pesanelli
jpesanelli@faseb.org
Managing Editor
Cody Mooneyhan
cmooneyhan@faseb.org
Peer Review Coordinator
Susan Moore
journals@faseb.org
Production Manager
Mary Kiorpes Hayden
mhayden@faseb.org
Editorial Associate
Gail Fallon
gfallon@faseb.org
Subscription Manager
Eleanor B. Peebles
800-43FASEB, ext. 7029 or 301-634-7029
Fax: 301-634-7099
staff@dues.faseb.org
|
Publications and Communications Committee |
|
Andrew J. Young (ACSM), Chair
David Gutterman (APS)
Edward T. Morgan (ASPET)
William G. Stetler-Stevenson (ASIP)
Yvonne Paterson (AAI)
Michiko Watanabe (AAA)
James U. Bowie (Protein)
Susan T. Weintraub (ABRF)
Louis C. Gerstenfeld (ASBMR)
Jasna Markovac (SDB)
Alan L. Johnson (SSR)
Belen Tornesi (TS)
Robert H. Heflich (EMS)
Scott Markel (ISCB)
Michael W. Deem (BMES)
Robert J. Freishtat (AFMR)
Ex Officio
Guy Fogleman (FASEB)
Gerald Weissmann (non-voting)
FASEB Society Executive Officers |
|
刊名字顺( Alphabetical List of Journals):
返回页首 