A|B|C|D|E|F|G|H|I|J|K|L|M|N|O|P|Q|R|S|T|U|V|W|X|Y|Z|ALL

检 索： 期刊全称 刊名关键词 ISSN         高级检索

期刊名称：CAMBRIDGE REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS ISSN： 0955-7571 出版频率： Bi-monthly 出版社： ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON, ENGLAND, OXON, OX14 4RN   出版社网址： http://www.routledge.com/ 期刊网址： http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/09557571.asp 影响因子： 3.096 (2020年) 0.656(2018年) 0.651(2017年) 0.896(2016年) 0.896(2015年) 0.438(2014年) 0.143(2013年) 0.288 (2012年) 0.345(2011年) 主题范畴： INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS;    POLITICAL SCIENCE 期刊简介(About the journal)    投稿须知(Instructions to Authors)    编辑部信息(Editorial Board)    About the journal The Cambridge Review of International Affairs publishes excellent and innovative scholarship on international affairs, particularly in the fields of international relations, international law and international political economy. It is committed to diversity of approach and method and encourages the submission of multi- and inter-disciplinary academic contributions from academics and policymakers. Scholarly debate is promoted through the Cambridge Review of International Affairs' main format of thematic sections of about four or five articles debating theoretical, empirical and/or methodological questions, as well as its book review forums and responses. The journal also carries one special issue each year. The submission of articles from panels, workshops, etc for joint publication is encouraged (all articles will be individually peer reviewed and evaluated). Peer Review All articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review. They are reviewed by at least three and usually around five reviewers. In the first round of peer reviewing, a majority of reviewers must recommend at least publication with revisions for authors to be invited to resubmit their revised papers. In the second round, a majority of the original peer reviewers must recommend publication of the paper as it stands. The Editors maintain final discretion over publication of all papers. Abstracting & Indexing The Cambridge Review of International Affairs is currently noted in the Public Affairs Information Service (PAIS). Sociological Abstracts, a division of Cambridge Scientific Abstracts has indexed the journal in the following fields: Linguistics & Language, Behavior Abstracts, Sociological Abstracts, Social Services Abstracts, Worldwide Political Science Abstracts. Instructions to Authors The Cambridge Review of International Affairs is a peer-reviewed journal in the fields of international relations, law and political economy. It is edited in the Centre of International Studies, University of Cambridge and published four times a year by Routledge, part of Taylor & Francis, an Informa Business. The Cambridge Review of International Affairs mainly publishes thematic sections of up to four or five articles debating theoretical, empirical and/or methodological questions, arising from, for example, conference panels or roundtables. Each manuscript is individually peer-reviewed and evaluated. The Cambridge Review of International Affairs welcomes solicited and unsolicited articles and book reviews. Articles should not exceed 9,000 words, including references and footnotes. Book reviews should not exceed 800 words for a review of one book and 1,500 words for a review of two books. The Cambridge Review of International Affairs may also occasionally publish shorter essays of up to 5,000 words from prominent scholars, practitioners and policy makers in international affairs. Articles and essays must include a 150-word abstract of the article or essay. Authors of articles, essays and book reviews must include, separately, a curriculum vitae statement of 70 words (which should include highest academic degree and university from which it was obtained, current affiliation / place of employment and title, previous relevant employment and relevant recent publications). Book reviewers are also requested to read and follow the instructions specific to book reviews set out under 'Book Review Guidelines' below. SUBMISSIONS All submissions should be made online at the Cambridge Review of International Affairs Manuscript Central site. New users should first create an account. Once a user is logged onto the site submissions should be made via the Author Centre. Authors should prepare and upload two versions of their manuscript. One should be a complete text, while in the second document all information identifying the author should be removed to allow them to be sent anonymously to referees. When uploading files authors will then be able to define the non-anonymous version as ¡°File not for review¡±.  Manuscripts should conform to the style guide set out below, including the Harvard referencing style. Authors of articles or essays will be asked during submission to supply the Cambridge Review of International Affairs with the names of at least five potential peer reviewers, together with their contact information. Do not include on this list anyone who has already commented on the paper; or any current or recent collaborators, institutional colleagues, mentors, students, or close friends (as per the American Political Science Review). All articles, essays and book reviews must be original. They cannot have been published previously in the same form nor can their substance be drawn from previously published books or articles (papers stored on online conference archives are accepted). Submissions to the Cambridge Review of International Affairs must not be under consideration in any form by other publisher(s). Simultaneous submissions to other journals are not accepted. The Cambridge Review of International Affairs requires the right of first publication, and the Centre of International Studies, the University of Cambridge the assignment of copyright (see information under 'Copyright' below). The Cambridge Review of International Affairs will rely on the author to verify the facts within the text and to undertake revisions as suggested by peer reviewers and the Cambridge Review's editors. SUBMISSION DEADLINES For submission deadlines for Volume 21, please see the 2008 production schedule; for Volume 22, please see the 2009 production schedule. PROOFS Authors are expected to correct proofs by deadlines set by the publisher, Routledge. No alterations to the original text are permitted at this stage. HARVARD REFERENCING STYLE This consists of: (a) brief citations in the text; and (b) a list of references at the end of the text giving full details of each work cited. The use of numbered footnotes is to be limited to cases where the material either does not have a clear author (an individual, group or an organization), or where the author wishes to make a substantive point related to the main text. Examples of where numbered footnotes would be used are for referring to an interview or for making a general reference to a website such as bbc.co.uk. Citations (Ickenberry et al 2003, 23) (Nanson and Och 2002, 3) (Darwin 1858) (1871, 236-238) References Published books Baun, Michael J (2000) A wider Europe: the process and politics of European Union enlargement (Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield) World Trade Organization (2004) Trade policy review: Brazil, 2004 (Geneva) Chapters in books Cottier, Thomas (2001) 'Risk management experience in WTO dispute settlement' in David Robertson and Aynsley J Kellow (eds) Globalization and the environment: risk assessment and the WTO (Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing), 41-62 [Note: It is sufficient to cite only the first city named by the publisher on the title page, except for the University of California Press which prefers 'Berkeley and Los Angeles'. Thus, 'Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing' not 'Cheltenham, United Kingdom and Northampton, Massachusetts, United States: Edward Elgar Publishing)] Articles in journals W ver, Ole (1996) 'European security identities', Journal of Common Market Studies, 34:1, 103-132 Legal Citations All legal citations, cases and other matters are to be referenced in line with The bluebook: a uniform system of citation (Cambridge: Harvard Law Review Association) Hansard Documents and United Nation Documents Documents relating to the official reports of papers, proceedings and motions of national governments, known as Hansard documents, are referenced in footnote form, which included document numbers and dates. United nation documents, for example, resolutions, Secretary-General's reports and others, are to be referenced in footnote form as their UN document number, with corresponding article or paragraph reference: A/RES/15/1514 of 14 December 1960, S/RES/379 (1975). See also www.un.org/Depts/dhl/resguide/symbol.htm Newspaper and magazines Bugaksaki, Janusz (2005) 'History is politics in Putin's Russia', Financial Times, 27 April The Sunday Times (1989) 'Bad day for Blair', 13 August, 12-16 Working papers Zellner, Wolfgang (2005) 'Managing change in Europe: evaluating the OSCE and its future role—competencies, capabilities and missions', Working Paper 13, Centre for OSCE Research, Hamburg Translations Foucault, Michel (1975) Surveiller et punir: naissance de la prison (Paris: Gallimard); transl Alan Sheridan (1977) Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison (London: Allen Lane) Barthes, Roland (1967) 'Le discours de l'histoire', Social Science Information, 6:4, 72-75; transl Peter Wexler (1970) 'Historical discourse' in Michael Lane (ed) Structuralism: a reader (London: Cape), 152-155 Unpublished documents Fusilio, Robert J (1966) 'The staging of battle scenes on the Shakespearian stage' (PhD dissertation, University of Birmingham) Leddy, John M (1944) 'Post-war commercial policy', 16 February, National Archives of the United States, Harley A Notter File, Record Group 59, Box 13 Leffingwell, Russell C (1939) 'Letter to Thomas W Lamont', 21 November, Baker Library, Harvard Business School, Thomas W Lamont Papers, Box 103 Online sources Zellner, Wolfgang (2005) 'Managing change in Europe: evaluating the OSCE and its future role—competencies, capabilities and missions', Working Paper 13, Centre for OSCE Research, , accessed 9 June 2005 Numbered footnotes 1. Interview with Francisco de Paulo Magalh es Gomes, 21 September 2001. 2. >. 3. On differences within the Constructivist school see Jeffrey Checkel (2003), Stefano Guzzini (2000), John Jacobsen (2003) and John Ruggie (1998). STYLE GUIDE Abbreviations Avoid the use of abbreviations ('that is' not 'ie'; 'for example' not 'eg'), especially at the start of sentences. Spell out acronyms on first use, placing the acronym in parenthesis immediately thereafter. Use the acronym for all subsequent references, except where it occurs at the start of a sentence. Do not use full points in abbreviations, initials of names, or acronyms ('Dr' not 'Dr.'; 'TJ Smith' not 'T.J. Smith'; 'US' not 'U.S.'; 'UN' not 'U.N.'). Capitals Sentence-style capitalization should be used when noting the title of a work or when adding headings to a manuscript. Accordingly, the first word and any proper nouns within the title should be capitalized. Where words are used in a general sense, lower case rather than capitals should be used. Capitalise geographical regions where boundaries are clearly defined ('Northern Ireland'; 'Southeast Asia'). Where boundaries are not clearly defined, use the lower case ('western Europe'; 'northeastern England'). Commas Do not use a serial (Oxford) comma, unless necessary to avoid ambiguity ('apples, oranges and pears' [no serial comma]; 'It begins with the question of which classes of effects to consider, of how to rank the concerned individual and collective goods, and of how to evaluate the trade-off between the uncertainty of known or unknown dangers and the certainty of known benefits of an innovation.' [insert serial comma]) Dates and Numbers Use the following date formats: 1 June 2004 (date, month, year) 1990s (no apostrophe) 21  Spell out ranges for years and page numbers in full ('1756-1763' not '1756-63; '313-315' not '313-5'). For closed ranges, please see rules on en dashes below. In the text, whole numbers up to and including ten should be written out in full. Two-word names of numbers less than one hundred are hyphenated (the number 34 should be written 'thirty-four', and 134 should be written 'one hundred and thirty-four'. Fractions are hyphenated when written out in full ('four-fifths'; 'two-thirds'). Begin a sentence with a number (or date) written out in full ('Thousands of viewers ...'; 'Nineteenth century mores ...') Numerals are used when the measure is expressed in abbreviated form or completely written out in full ('500km' [no space] or 'five hundred kilometres'; ' 100m' [no space] or 'one hundred million pounds'). Em Dashes, En Dashes and Hyphens An em dash (a dash the width of the letter 'm') is used to indicate a parenthetical statement ('The Kyoto Protocol, the International Criminal Court, and other initiatives—many of them emanating largely from Europe—were bound to test the Atlantic framework regardless of the American administration of the day.') or an open range ('Peter Smith, 1988?). An en dash (a dash the width of the letter 'n') is used to mean 'to' or to indicate a closed range ('pages 37-59'; 'August-September 2005'). The hyphen is used most commonly to combine words. For more on the use of hyphens, please see below. Do not leave a space before or after the em dash, the en dash or the hyphen, except where the lack of space would cause confusion ('5 March - 3 June' not '5 March-3 June'), or where it is a hanging hyphen ('nineteenth- and twentieth-century literature'). The em dash and en dash can be inserted in a text by choosing them from the menu of special characters. In Microsoft Word, pull down the 'Insert' window, click on 'Symbol' and then on the 'Special Characters' folder tab. Foreign words Italicise foreign words, unless they have been accepted into the English language. Retain linguistic ligatures unless the word has been anglicized. Headings and paragraphing Headings are encouraged where their addition increases the clarity of the argument being advanced. When used, there should be a maximum of two levels of heading. Top-level headings should be bolded and sub-headings within a section should be italicized. A heading or subheading, together with the first paragraph following it, should be flush left (with no indent). Subsequent paragraphs should then be indented. Hyphens Hyphens should be used where two or more words are used adjectivally ('part-time course'). Multiple words used as nouns should not be hyphenated, unless they contain a noun and present participle combination ('six months'; 'decision-making'). pre/post Generally, words with the prefixes 'pre' and 'post' are written as a single word unless they prefix proper nouns ('post-Keynesian') or a repetition of letters could cause confusion ('pre-emptive'). anti/ante Generally, words with the prefix 'anti' are hyphenated while those with the prefix 'ante' are not ('anti-aircraft'; 'antecedent'). co In general, words prefixed by 'co' are not hyphenated ('cooperate'). trans Do not hyphenate words with this prefix ('transnational') unless the second part of the word is spelt with a capital letter ('trans-Atlantic'). Italics The judicious use of italics for effect is acceptable. Legal case names are italicised. If the definite article is part a title or name, the definite article must be italicised ('The Times'). Lists Lists should be introduced by a colon, followed by a single space. Allow punctuation, indentation, etc to vary in accordance with the needs of the list, but be consistent. If using 'etc' at the end of a list, it should be preceded by a comma and concluded with a single full stop. Quotes The use of ellipses to indicate the omission of material from original quote Ellipsis (a series of three points), with a space on each side, should be inserted into a quote to indicate the omission of material from the original quote. This ensures that the work of another person is not misrepresented. Specials cases: (a) When placing an ellipsis at the end of a quote to indicate the omission of material, use four points—three-point ellipses and a period. The ellipses should follow a blank space. The First Amendment provides that 'Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech....' US Constitution Amendment I (b) Do not place an ellipsis at the beginning of a quote to indicate the omission of material.  (c) When combining a fully quoted sentence with a partially quoted sentence, or with a second, but nonconsecutive quoted sentence, place a period at the end of the fully quoted sentence, followed by a space, an ellipsis, another space, and the remainder of the quoted material. In a unanimous decision, Justice Holmes wrote, 'The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. ... When a nation is at war many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight and that no Court could regard them as protected by any constitutional right.' Schenck v United States, 249 US 47, 52 (1919) (d) When omitting one or more entire paragraphs, indicate the omission by indenting four points and placing them on a separate line. Poverty imposes costs on the nonpoor that warrant, on strictly economic grounds and without regard to ethical or political considerations, incurring some costs to reduce it. For example, poverty in the midst of a generally wealthy society is likely to increase the incidence of crime: the forgone income of a legitimate alternative occupation is low for someone who has little earning capacity in legitimate occupations, while the proximity of wealth increases the expected return from crime, or, stated another way, the cost of honesty. . . . . An individual who feels endangered or appalled at the poverty around him can contribute to an organization designed to alleviate that poverty an amount equal to the benefit that he would derive from the reduction of poverty enabled by his contribution (net of administrative costs). Posner, RA (1977) Economic analysis of law (New York: Little, Brown and Company) 350 (from http://www.kentlaw.edu/academics/lrw/grinker/LwtaEllipses.htm) Position of punctuation at the end of quote Commas, full stops, question marks and exclamation marks should be contained within or follow after quotation marks depending on whether they belong to the quote: if so, they go inside the quotation marks; if not, outside. Quotation marks Single quotation marks should be used, unless for a quote within a quote, in which case double quotation marks should be employed for the inner quote. If a quote is longer than two type-written lines, offset it within the body of the text without quotation marks. Spacing A single space should separate each sentence. Spelling: British versus American Use British rather than American spellings ('per cent' not 'percent'; 'practice' (noun), 'practise' (verb) not 'practice' (both as noun and verb)), save where the word is part of a title, a proper name, or a quote. Authors are advised to set their word processor spell checker to English (UK). Where in doubt, please refer to the Oxford English Dictionary, available online at www.askoxford.com/dictionaries/compact_oed/?view=uk BOOK REVIEW GUIDELINES Book reviews should assume that the reader has not read the book(s) under review and offer a very brief summary of the same. The review should position the book within the relevant field of literature, as well as give a few points of information on the author's background. It is imperative that the book review contain substantive analysis and comments on issues raised by the book(s). The book review should not be an excuse for presenting the reviewer's own views on a theme. All important bibliographic information, including number of pages and ISBN, must be provided in the format set out below. If the book has appeared both as paperback and hardback, include both points of information. Herfried M nkler, The new wars, Cambridge, England, Polity Press, 2005, ISBN 0745633366 (hbk), 192 pp, ISBN 0745633374 (pbk), 224 pp Quotes from the book(s) under review must be accompanied by the relevant page reference set out within parenthesis directly after the quote ('(584)'). We encourage reviews of two books offering different approaches to the same subject. Different approaches may be the result of the respective authors coming from different schools of thought or even disciplines. It may also be the result of a theoretical problem being discussed using different case studies. The Cambridge Review of International Affairs invites authors of reviewed books to respond. The Cambridge Review of International Affairs only accepts reviews of books published within a year before the issue in which the review is due to appear. Reviews of books published in other main languages are also considered. COPIES FOR AUTHORS Free article access: Corresponding authors can receive 50 free reprints, free online access to their article through our website (www.informaworld.com) and a complimentary copy of the issue containing their article. Complimentary reprints are available through Rightslink® and additional reprints can be ordered through Rightslink® when proofs are received. If you have any queries, please contact our reprints department at reprints@tandf.co.uk COPYRIGHT It is a condition of publication that authors assign copyright or licence the publication rights in their articles, including abstracts, to the Centre of International Studies, University of Cambridge. This enables us to ensure full copyright protection and to disseminate the article, and of course the Journal, to the widest possible readership in print and electronic formats as appropriate. Authors retain many rights under the Taylor & Francis rights policies, which can be found at www.informaworld.com/authors_journals_copyright_position. Authors are themselves responsible for obtaining permission to reproduce copyright material from other sources. Editorial Board Editor-in-Chief: Josef Ansorge, Centre for International Studies, University of Cambridge, UK Managing Editors: Alexander Anievas, Centre for International Studies, University of Cambridge, UK Mui Pong Goh, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Cambridge, UK   Book Review Editor: David Duncan, Centre of International Studies, University of Cambridge, UK  David Schmeisser, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, UK David Verbeeten, Faculty of Politics, Psychology, Sociology and International Studies, University of Cambridge, UK  Outreach Director: Mui Pong Goh ¨C Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Cambridge, UK Editorial Board: CHAIR: Christopher Hill - University of Cambridge, UK Amitav Acharya - University of Bristol, UK Gerald Chan - Durham University, UK Ian Clark - University of Wales, UK Thomas Diez - University of Birmingham, UK Geoffrey Edwards - University of Cambridge, UK Toni Erskine - University of Wales, UK Roxane Farmanfarmaian - University of Cambridge, UK Andrew Gamble - University of Cambridge, UK Stefan Halper - University of Cambridge, UK and Donner Foundation, US Geoffrey Hawthorn - University of Cambridge, UK Christopher R. Hughes - London School of Economics and Political Science, UK George Joffe - King's College London, UK Lynn Kuok Biography - Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Cambridge, UK  James Mayall - University of Cambridge, UK Mette Eilstrup Sangiovanni - University of Cambridge, UK Philip Towle - University of Cambridge, UK International Editorial Board: Cecilia Albin - Uppsala University, Sweden Graham Allison - Harvard University, US Rasmus Bertlesen - Harvard University, US Jarat Chopra - Brown University, US Hon. Gareth Evans - International Crisis Group, Belgium Roger Fisher - Harvard Law School, US Robert Gilpin - Princeton University, US Donald Hellmann - University of Washington, US Jeffrey Herzog  - BBVA Compass, US Takashi Inoguchi - Chuo University, Japan Robert Jervis - Columbia University, US Alastair Iain Johnston - Harvard University, US Peter Katzenstein - Cornell University, US Robert Keohane - Princeton University, US Kishore Mahbubani - National University of Singapore, Singapore Chung-in Moon - Yansei University, South Korea Richard Langhorne - Rutgers University, US Andrew Moravcsik - Princeton University, US David Perry - Vann Center for Ethics, Davidson College, US Ashwini Ray - Jawaharlal Nehru University, India W Michael Reisman - Yale Law School, US Alfred P. Rubin - Tufts University, US Amadu Sesay - Obafemi Awolowo University, Nigeria Joel Trachtman - Tufts University, US Wang Gungwu - University of Singapore Charlotte Warakaulle - United Nations, Switzerland Ole Waever - University of Copenhagen, Denmark