期刊名称:CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY
期刊简介(About the journal)
投稿须知(Instructions to Authors)
编辑部信息(Editorial Board)
About the journal

The Current Opinion journals were developed out of the recognition that it is increasingly difficult for specialists to keep up to date with the expanding volume of information published in their subject. In Current Opinion in Psychology, we help the reader by providing in a systematic manner:
- The views of experts on current advances in psychology in a clear and readable form.
- Evaluations of the most interesting papers, annotated by experts, from the great wealth of original publications.
The journal is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journalsand is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows.
Division of the subject into sections
Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance.
The topics covered will include:
* Biological psychology * Clinical psychology * Cognitive psychology * Community psychology * Comparative psychology * Developmental psychology * Educational psychology * Environmental psychology * Evolutionary psychology * Health psychology * Neuropsychology * Personality psychology * Social psychology
Selection of topics to be reviewed
Section Editors, who are major authorities in the field, are appointed by the Editors of the journal. They divide their section into a number of topics, ensuring that the field is comprehensively covered and that all issues of current importance are emphasised. Section Editors commission reviews from authorities on each topic that they have selected.
Reviews
Authors write short review articles in which they present recent developments in their subject, emphasising the aspects that, in their opinion, are most important. In addition, they provide short annotations to the papers that they consider to be most interesting from all those published in their topic over the previous year.
Review articles in Current Opinion in Psychology are by invitation only.
Editorial Overview
Section Editors write a short overview at the beginning of the section to introduce the reviews and to draw the reader's attention to any particularly interesting developments.
Current Opinion in Psychology builds on Elsevier's reputation for excellence in scientific publishing and long-standing commitment to communicating reproducible biomedical research targeted at improving human health. It is a companion to the new Gold Open Access journal Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology and is part of the Current Opinion and Research(CO+RE) suite of journals. All CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy-of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach-to ensure they are a widely read resource that is integral to scientists' workflow.
Expertise - Editors and Editorial Board bring depth and breadth of expertise and experience to the journal.
Discoverability - Articles get high visibility and maximum exposure on an industry-leading platform that reaches a vast global audience.
Benefits to authors
We also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services.
For more information, please refer to: https://www.elsevier.com/conflictsofinterest
Please contact us if you have ideas for the journal: copsyc@elsevier.com
- PubMed/Medline
- Social Sciences Citation Index
- PsycINFO
- Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
- Google Scholar
- Scopus
Instructions to Authors 734336.pdf
Editorial Board
Editors-in-Chief
Editorial Board
Jonathan S. AbramowitzUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Counseling and Psychological Services, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Gordon J. G. AsmundsonUniversity of Regina Department of Psychology, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Erin C. BerenzUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
Amit BernsteinUniversity of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
Herbert BlessUniversity of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
Robert BöhmRWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
Julia D. BucknerLouisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
Gian Vittoria CapraraUniversity of Rome La Sapienza, Roma, Italy
Charles CarverUniversity of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, United States
Margaret ClarkYale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Janine ClarkeMend Psychology, Oatley, New South Wales, Australia
Jan CopelandNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
Katja CorcoranUniversity of Graz, Graz, Austria
Eveline Crone, PhDLeiden University Department of Psychologie, Leiden, Netherlands
Stacey DaughtersUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Carsten de DreuLeiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
Nadira FaberUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Klaus FiedlerHeidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
Joe ForgasUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Adam GonzalezStony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States
Stefan G. HofmannBoston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Emily A. HolmesKarolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
Gun Peggy KnudsenNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
Lydia KrabbendamVU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Frank KruegerGeorge Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, United States
Arie KruglanskiUniversity of Maryland at College Park, College Park, Maryland, United States
Carl LejuezUniversity of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States
Michela LenziUniversity of Padua, Padova, Italy
Adam M. LeventhalUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States
Nira LibermanTel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Jeffrey LohrUniversity of Arkansas Bookstore, Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States
Lance McCrackenKing's College London, London, United Kingdom
Harald MerckelbachMaastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
Batja MesquitaKU Leuven Center for Social and Cultural Psychology, Leuven, Belgium
Mario MikulincerInterdisciplinary Center Herzliya, Herzliya, Israel
Melissa NorbergMacquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Michael I. NortonHarvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Bunmi OlatunjiVanderbilt University, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Miranda OlffUniversity of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Judith ProchaskaStanford University, Stanford, California, United States
David G. RandMassachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Ronald M. RapeeMacquarie University Department of Psychology, Sydney, Australia
Craig SawchukMayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Norman B. SchmidtFlorida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, United States
Carla SharpUniversity of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
Jeffry A. SimpsonUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Jasper A. SmitsThe University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States
Matthew T. TullThe University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, United States
Ayse K. UskulUniversity of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom
Kees Van den BosUtrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
Michael VaseyOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, Columbus, Ohio, United States
Anka A. VujanovicUniversity of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
Denise D. WalkerUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
Marieke WichersUniversity of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
Junhui WuBeijing Normal University, Beijing, China
|