期刊名称:SOCIO-ECONOMIC REVIEW

ISSN:1475-1461
出版频率:Quarterly
出版社:OXFORD UNIV PRESS, GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX2 6DP
  出版社网址:http://www.oxfordjournals.org/jnls/online
期刊网址:http://ser.oxfordjournals.org/
影响因子: 1.926(2015年) 1.545(2014年) 1.717(2013年) 2.059 (2012年) 1.78(2011年)
主题范畴:ECONOMICS;    POLITICAL SCIENCE;    SOCIOLOGY

期刊简介(About the journal)    投稿须知(Instructions to Authors)    编辑部信息(Editorial Board)   



About the journal

Originating in the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics (SASE), Socio-Economic Review (SER) is part of a broader movement in the social sciences for the rediscovery of the socio-political foundations of the economy. Devoted to the advancement of socio-economics, it deals with the analytical, political and moral questions arising at the intersection between economy and society. Articles in SER explore how the economy is or should be governed by social relations, institutional rules, political decisions, and cultural values. They also consider how the economy in turn affects the society of which it is part, for example by breaking up old institutional forms and giving rise to new ones. The domain of the journal is deliberately broadly conceived, so new variations to its general theme may be discovered and editors can learn from the papers that readers submit. To enhance international dialogue, Socio-Economic Review accepts the submission of translated articles that are simultaneously published in a language other than English.

In pursuit of its program, SER is eager to promote interdisciplinary dialogue between sociology, economics, political science and moral philosophy, through both empirical and theoretical work. Empirical papers may be qualitative as well as quantitative, and theoretical papers will not be confined to deductive model-building. Papers suggestive of more generalizable insights into the economy as a domain of social action will be preferred over narrowly specialized work. While firmly committed to the highest standards of scholarly excellence, Socio-Economic Review encourages discussion of the practical and ethical dimensions of economic action, with the intention to contribute to both the advancement of social science and the building of a good economy in a good society.

Socio-Economic Review aspires to develop into a seedbed for a new attempt, more than overdue, at a sociologically informed and politically perceptive institutional economics – one that takes history seriously, does justice to the complexity of social systems and its profound consequences for theory-building, recognizes the distinctive dignity of the human lifeworld and the importance of political mobilization and collective action in the interest of social progress and social stability, and engages in informed dialogue with political and moral philosophy to avoid the fallacies of technocracy. Such a theory can form and grow in confrontation with a wide range of subjects employing a wide variety of methods: by looking at consumption and investment, corporate governance, the regulation of capital markets, at labor markets and labor market policy, the organization of work and the changing division of labor, international trade and regional development, technological innovation, welfare state regimes and production regimes, the governance of the international economy, the provision of social order in industrial districts etc. etc. On all of these, SER hopes to offer its readers first-rate empirical and theoretical work that is of interest beyond the narrow circles of disciplinary specialists.

Wolfgang Streeck
Bruno Amable
Jens Beckert
Lane Kenworthy
Marc Schneiberg
Jürgen Feick

Award Winner:

Lane Kenworthy is the winner of the Aldi J.M. Hagenaars LIS Memorial Award for his paper Varieties of Welfare Capitalism (Socio-Economic Review Volume 1 Issue 1), co-authored by Alex Hicks.

ABSTRACTING & INDEXING SERVICES

Socio-Economic Review is covered by the following abstracting and indexing services:

Current Contents® /Social and Behavioral Sciences
EconLit
International Political Science Abstracts
PROQUEST DATABASE : ABI/INFORM Complete
PROQUEST DATABASE : ABI/INFORM Global
PROQUEST DATABASE : ProQuest 5000
PROQUEST DATABASE : ProQuest 5000 International
PROQUEST DATABASE : ProQuest Central
PROQUEST DATABASE : ProQuest Discovery
PROQUEST DATABASE : ProQuest International Academic Research Library
PROQUEST DATABASE : ProQuest Pharma Collection
PROQUEST DATABASE : ProQuest Research Library
PROQUEST DATABASE : ProQuest Sociology
RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
Scopus
Social Science Research Network (SSRN)
Social Sciences Citation Index®


Instructions to Authors

All material to be considered for publication in Socio-Economic Review should be in electronic form via the journal's online submission and review system.

Peer review is anonymous and we therefore ask you to submit a title page separate from the manuscript. The title page should contain the title, authors' names and address, acknowledgements and word count. The main document should be kept anonymous and contain title, abstract, SER keywords, JEL classification and main body of the document. Please refrain from any self-citations such as "authors' own" etc. in both text, footnotes and bibliography.

Details on how to submit online and how to upload the manuscripts are given in the online submission instructions. But, please, read our guidelines for the preparation of manuscripts first.

LICENCE TO PUBLISH

It is a condition of publication in the Journal that authors grant an exclusive licence to Oxford University Press and the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics. This ensures that requests from third parties to reproduce articles are handled efficiently and consistently and will also allow the article to be as widely disseminated as possible. As part of the licence agreement, authors may use their own material in other publications provided that the Journal is acknowledged in writing as the original place of publication and Oxford University Press as the publisher. The form can be downloaded from the following link: licence to publish form

PREPARATION OF MANUSCRIPTS

  • The maximum length of articles including references, notes and abstract is 10,000, and the minimum length is 6,000 words.
  • Articles must be accompanied by an abstract of no more than 150 words.
  • Articles must be accompanied by SER keywords (up to 6) and JEL classification (up to 3). Please add the respective JEL keywords to the descriptors.
    - For the link to the SER keyword list please click here.
    - The JEL classification can be found at http://www.aeaweb.org/journal/jel_class_system.html.
  • The main document has to be anonymous and should contain title, abstract, SER keywords, JEL classification and the main body of the document - strictly avoiding self-references. Please, prepare your manuscript text using a Word processing package (save and submit in .doc or .rtf format). Files must not be supplied in PDF format. Manuscripts should be one and a half-spaced, including text in tables, legends and references.
  • The author's name, institutional affiliation, and full contact details (postal, phone, fax, and e-mail), acknowledgements and a word count should be supplied on the title page which has to be uploaded as a separate file.
  • Authors should pay particular attention to the accuracy and correct presentation of citations and references in the text as well as in the reference list at the end of the manuscript. For examples please click here.
  • If you are using Endnote as a bibliographical and citation programme you may download the "style" which approximates SER requirements. Please note that by using this style your reference list will only correspond to the SER requirements as far as the Endnote programme allows. If necessary, please adapt your reference list manually. Please download our Endnote style here.
  • Footnotes should be kept to a minimum. They should be indicated in the text by superscript figures and collected at the end of the article in numerical order (Arabic numerals). If you use the Word programme choose: Footnotes as endnotes.
  • Illustrations and tables must be electronic and each one has to be provided in an individual file so that they can be uploaded separately in the online submission procedure. They should be numbered in Arabic numerals and should be referred to in the text (indicate location by mentioning table or figure number and title). They should be comprehensible without reading the text, and the source has to be cited correctly. Although Word, Excel, PDF and jpeg files are acceptable, the preferred file formats are high-resolution tif-files (1200 d.p.i. for line drawings and 300 d.p.i. for half-tone artwork). Since figure files cannot be altered, titles and additional descriptions under or above an illustration should not be included in the figure file but in the text of the article. For useful information on preparing your figures for publication, go to http://dx.sheridan.com/onl. Please note that publication of your manuscript will not proceed until figures suitable for reproduction are received. Please also see 'Permission information' below regarding use of illustrations already published elsewhere.

Important: Before submitting your manuscript electronically you should have the following types of files ready:

  • 1 title page with author(s) information - if applicable, acknowledgements - and word count;
  • 1 anonymous text file without this title page and without other information allowing to identify the author(s), including the abstract (maximum 150 words) below the title and SER keywords as well as JEL classification following the abstract;
  • 1 separate file for each figure and for each table; it helps to list them in the order in which they appear in the ms as they have to be uploaded exactly in this order in the online submission procedure.
    The text file must not contain the tables and figures.

Papers submitted to this journal which do not adhere to these Guidelines for Authors or the Online Submission Instructions will be returned for appropriate revision to be in line with these Guidelines. They may then be re-submitted.

PROOFS

Proofs will be sent to the first named or corresponding author only. In the case of joint authors, please ensure amendments are returned from this author only. Page proofs will be sent to the author responsible for checking them as a PDF file. Corrected proofs should be returned within three days of receipt. All misprints should be corrected, but the author is asked to refrain from making any other alterations. Such alterations may be disallowed and where they are allowed the author may be held responsible for the cost of making them.

AUTHOR SELF-ARCHIVING/PUBLIC ACCESS POLICY

For information about this journal's policy, please visit our Author Self-Archiving policy page.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

For information about this journal's policy, please visit our Conflict of interest policy page.

FUNDING

Details of all funding sources for the work in question should be given in a separate section entitled 'Funding'. This should appear before the 'Acknowledgements' section.

The following rules should be followed:

  • The sentence should begin: ‘This work was supported by …’
  • The full official funding agency name should be given, i.e. ‘National Institutes of Health? not ‘NIH?(full RIN-approved list of UK funding agencies) Grant numbers should be given in brackets as follows: ‘[grant number xxxx]?
  • Multiple grant numbers should be separated by a comma as follows: ‘[grant numbers xxxx, yyyy]?
  • Agencies should be separated by a semi-colon (plus ‘and?before the last funding agency)
  • Where individuals need to be specified for certain sources of funding the following text should be added after the relevant agency or grant number 'to [author initials]'.

An example is given here: ‘This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [AA123456 to C.S., BB765432 to M.H.]; and the Alcohol & Education Research Council [hfygr667789].

Oxford Journals will deposit all NIH-funded articles in PubMed Central. See http://www.oxfordjournals.org/for_authors/repositories.html for details. Authors must ensure that manuscripts are clearly indicated as NIH-funded using the guidelines above.

LANGUAGE EDITING

Particularly if English is not your first language, before submitting your manuscript you may wish to have it edited for language. This is not a mandatory step, but may help to ensure that the academic content of your paper is fully understood by journal editors and reviewers. Language editing does not guarantee that your manuscript will be accepted for publication. If you would like information about one such service please click here. There are other specialist language editing companies that offer similar services and you can also use any of these. Authors are liable for all costs associated with such services.

PRE-PUBLICATION POLICY

Socio-Economic Review does not accept papers that have been previously published elsewhere with the exception of working papers series. The Journal’s policy regarding working paper series is:

1. Pre-publication in working paper series is allowed where submission to the working paper series is prior to acceptance by the Journal.

2. The working paper version may remain online after publication in the Journal.

3. The working paper version should NOT be updated after acceptance by the Journal.

4. Authors are requested to append the appropriate citation to the working paper version on acceptance by the Journal (if the working paper series allows this).

PERMISSIONS INFORMATION

If illustrations or figures are to be duplicated from previously published work, written permission must be obtained both from the publisher and the author, and a credit line giving the source added to the relevant Figure Legend. If text material (250 to 300 words) is to be reproduced from published sources, written permission is required from both publisher and author. For shorter quotations, it is sufficient to add a bibliographic credit. The Letters containing the permission for the reproduction of either text or illustrations must accompany the manuscript. If you have been unable to obtain permission, please indicate this.

  • Note: Before you begin, you should be sure you are using an up-to-date version of Netscape or Internet Explorer. If you have an earlier version, you can download a free upgrade using the icons found at the bottom of the 'Instructions and Forms' section of the online submission web site.
  • First, you will need to log into the online submission site.
  • If you know your login details (i.e., you have submitted or reviewed a manuscript in this journal before), use your User ID and Password to log on. (Your user ID will usually be your email address.)
  • If you do not know your login details, check to see if you are already registered by clicking on the 'Forgot your password' button and following the on-screen instructions. If you are not already registered, you can register by clicking on the 'Create account' button on the login screen and following the on-screen instructions.
  • If you have trouble finding your manuscripts or have other problems with your account, do not create another account. Instead, please contact Juergen Feick at the journal's editorial office.
  • To submit a new manuscript, go to the 'Author Centre', and click on “Click here to submit a new manuscript', and then follow the on-screen instructions. There are up to 7 steps for you to follow to submit your manuscript. You move from one step to the next by clicking on the 'Next' button on each screen or back to the previous screen by clicking on the 'Previous' button. Please note that if you click on the 'Back' or 'Forward' buttons on your browser, the information you have entered will not be saved. At any stage you can stop the submission process by clicking on the 'Main Menu' button. Everything you have typed into the system will be saved, and the partially completed submission will appear under 'unsubmitted manuscripts' in your 'Author Centre'. To return to the submission process you will need to click on the button 'Continue Submission' against the relevant manuscript title.
  • IMPORTANT NOTE 1: Your manuscript and the seperate title page must be uploaded as files saved as a Word processing package (i.e. doc or .rtf format) and not as a PDF file. Furthermore, each table or figure has to be uploaded as a separate file. Please make sure that your tables and figures are edited and numbered according to the 'Instructions to Authors' and the following 'IMPORTANT NOTE 2'
  • IMPORTANT NOTE 2. Although Word, Excel, PDF and jpeg files are acceptable for figures, the preferred file format are high-resolution .tif files (1200 d.p.i. for line drawings and 300 d.p.i. for half-tone artwork). For useful information on preparing your figures for publication, go to http://dx.sheridan.com/onl. Please note that publication of your manuscript will not proceed until figures suitable for reproduction are received.
  • When submitting your manuscript, please enter your manuscript data into the relevant fields, following the detailed instructions at the top of each page. You may like to have the original word-processing file available so you can copy and paste the title and abstract into the required fields. You will also be required to provide email addresses for your co-authors, so please have these to hand when you log onto the site.
  • When you come to upload your manuscript files via the 'File Upload' screen:
      • Enter individual files using the 'Browse' buttons and select the appropriate 'File type?from the pull-down menu. Peer review is anonymous and we therefore ask you to submit an anonymous text file without the author details. Please refrain from any self-citations such as "authors' own" etc. in both text, footnotes, references and bibliography. Author data should be provided on the title page only. For details on what the anonymous text file and the title page should contain and how they have to be formatted please consult the Guidelines for Authors. Further details on how to upload the manuscripts are given during the upload process.
      • Upload your files by clicking on the 'Upload files' button. This converts your files to a PDF and may take several minutes. Click on the SAVE button to confirm the upload. Repeat these steps until you have uploaded all your files ?including one file for each table and/or figure. You will see only the anonymous version (plus any figures and tables) in the PDF. This PDF is the one that the reviewers will see.
      • If you have uploaded any figures or tables you will be prompted to provide figure/table captions and 'file tags' that will link figures to text in the HTML proof of your text file.
      • Once you have uploaded all your files, indicate the order in which they should appear in your paper. This will determine the order in which they appear in the consolidated PDF used for peer review.
      • After the successful upload of your text and images, you will need to view and proofread your manuscript. Please do this by clicking on the HTML button or the PDF button.
      • If the files have not been uploaded to your satisfaction, go back to the file upload screen where you can remove the files you do not want and repeat the process.
      • When you are satisfied with the uploaded manuscript proof click on 'Next' which will take you to the 'Review & Submit' screen. The system will check that you have completed all the mandatory fields and that you have viewed your manuscript proof. It will also present you with a summary of all the information you have provided and give you a final chance to edit it. If there is a red cross next to any section this will indicate that not all the fields have been filled in correctly. You may either go back to the relevant page or click the nearest ‘edit?button.
      • When you have finished reviewing this information press 'Submit'.
      • After the manuscript has been submitted you will see a confirmation screen and receive an email confirmation stating that your manuscript has been successfully submitted. This will also give the assigned manuscript number, which is used in all correspondence during peer review. If you do not receive this, your manuscript will not have been successfully submitted to the journal and the paper cannot progress to peer review. If this is the case your manuscript will still be sitting in the 'Unsubmitted Manuscripts' section of your 'Author Centre' awaiting your attention.
      • If you return to your 'Author Centre' after successful submission you will notice that your newly submitted manuscript can be found in the 'Submitted Manuscripts' area. The ‘Status' section provides information on the status of your manuscript as it moves through the review process.

Submitting a revised manuscript

  • Log on to the online submission web site as before and, in the 'Author Centre', click on 'Manuscripts with Decisions'. At the bottom of the screen you will see those manuscripts that require a revision (or that have been revised). Create a revision of this manuscript by clicking on 'create a revision' under Actions. You will now be able to see the editor and reviewer comments and will be able to respond to these.
  • You will need to upload the files that constitute your revised manuscript. To facilitate the production process, it is essential that you upload your revised manuscript as a .doc, .rtf, or .tex file, and not in .pdf format. If you wish to finish this another time, you will find the manuscript in your 'Revised manuscripts in draft' list.
  • If you click on 'View comments/respond' you will see the editor's letter to you together with the referees' comments. You may cut and paste your responses into the text areas at the bottom of the screen.

Getting help. If you experience any problems during the online submission process please consult the Author's User Guide which provides more detailed submission instructions and 'movie tutorials' explaining how to submit your paper. Alternatively, please contact Juergen Feick at the journal's editorial office who will be pleased to assist you.

 Examples of citations and references

Citations or in-text references should be cited by giving the ‘author's name/s, year of publication?in parenthesis: (Smith, 1999), (Hall and Soskice, 2001) or (Maurice et al., 1986) in case of more than two authors. Specific page numbers after a direct quotation should be written as follows ?(Smith, 1999, p. 26) or (Hall and Soskice, 2001, pp. 55?7).
In-text lists of references should be listed in chronological order.

A reference list should appear at the end and should include only those references cited in the text. References should be one and a half-spaced and arranged alphabetically by author and chronologically for each author. Publications for the same author appearing in a single year should use a, b, c, etc.

Where there are more than two authors, the reference within the text should cite the first author et al. and the year: (Smith et al., 2000). The reference list should include all the authors for each publication: Smith, J., Doe, J. and Jones, R. (2000).

When citing chapters in edited books, the page numbers should be listed at the very end of the entry in the following format: …Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, pp. 27-39.

When citing articles in journals, the page numbers should be listed at the very end of the entry in the following format: Socio-Economic Review, 5, 87-96. Please note that the volume number is in bold face and that the page numbers are not preceded by 'pp'.

For the citation of newspaper articles or internet sources, please see the examples below.

Sample references as they should appear in the References list:

BOOKS

Hollingsworth, J. R. and Boyer, R. (1997) Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions, Cambridge/New York, NY, Cambridge University Press.

Maurice, M., Sellier, F. and Silvestre, J.-J. (1986) The Social Foundations of Industrial Power: A Comparison of France and Germany, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.


EDITED BOOKS

Streeck, W. and Thelen, K. (eds) (2005) Beyond Continuity: Explorations in the Dynamics of Advanced Political Economies, Oxford, Oxford University Press.


BOOK CHAPTERS

Biddle J. (1991) ‘The Instrumental Presentism of John R. Commons? In Brown, J. and van Keuren, D. (eds) The Estate of Social Knowledge, Baltimore, MD, John Hopkins Press, pp. 84-105.


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Schneiberg, M. (2005) ‘What’s on the Path? Path Dependence, Organizational Diversity and the Problem of Institutional Change in the US Economy, 1900-1950? Socio-Economic Review, 5, 47-80.


NEWSPAPER ARTICLES

Epstein, E. (2006, February 2) 'Lawmakers Rip Net Giants for Bowing to China Censors', The San Francisco Chronicle, San Francisco, CA, p. A7.

The New York Times (2005, June 10) 'An Important Election Safeguard', New York, NY, p. 20.


ELECTRONIC ARTICLES

Rodrik, D. (2002) ‘Feasible Globalizations? accessed at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~drodrik/papers.html on March 31, 2002.

Ahrweiler, P., Gilbert, N. and Pyka, A. (2006) ‘Institutions Matter but ... ?Organisational Alignment in Knowledge-Based Industries? Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 2, p. 39-58, accessed at http://www.sti-studies.de/articles/2006-01/Ahrweiler-160306.pdf on April 16, 2006.


CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS

Casper, S. and Murray, F. (2003) ‘Commercialising science: how the organization of scientific labour markets impacts the development of biotech clusters? Proceedings of the Social Construction of Clusters Conference, Visby, Sweden.

Sunder, S. (2006) ‘Balancing norms and Standards in Regulation of Accounting? paper presented at the Annual Conference of SASE, Special Session on Accounting and Economics, University of Trier, Trier, Germany, June 30–July 2.


DISCUSSION/WORKING PAPERS

Boeri, T., Conde-Ruiz, J. I. and Galasso, V. (2003) Protecting against Labour Market Risk: Employment Protection or Unemployment Benefits?, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3990, London, Center for Economic Policy Research.

Boeri, T., Conde-Ruiz, J. I. and Galasso, V. (2006) The Political Economy of Flexicurity, FEDEA Working Papers, 2006-15, Madrid, Fundación de Estudios de Economía Aplicada.

Schmitter, P. and Streeck, W. (1999) The Organization of Business Interests. Studying the Associative Action of Business in Advanced Industrial Societies, MPIfG Discussion Paper 99/1, Cologne, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.

 


Instructions to Authors
ser_keywords.pdf

Editorial Board

Editors

Wolfgang Streeck (Chief Editor)
Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies (MPIfG)
Cologne, Germany
www.mpifg.de/people/ws/

Bruno Amable (Editor)
Universit?de Paris I Panthéon ?Sorbonne
Paris, France
www.jourdan.ens.fr/~amable/

Jens Beckert (Editor)
MPIfG
Cologne, Germany
www.mpifg.de/people/jb1/

Lane Kenworthy (Editor)
University of Arizona
Tucson, AR, USA
www.u.arizona.edu/~lkenwor/
lkenwor@email.arizona.edu

Marc Schneiberg (Editor)
Reed College
Portland, OR, USA
//academic.reed.edu/sociology/faculty/schneiberg/

Jürgen Feick (Managing Editor)
MPIfG
Cologne, Germany
www.mpifg.de/people/jf/

ADVISORY COMMITTTEE

Robert Boyer France
Bruce Carruthers USA
Neil Fligstein USA
Alex Hicks USA
Rogers Hollingsworth USA
Greta Krippner USA
David Marsden UK
Michael Piore USA
Kathleen Thelen USA
Jonathan Zeitlin The Netherlands

EDITORIAL BOARD

Nina Bandelj USA
Jürgen Beyer Germany
Fred Block USA
John Campbell USA
Colin Crouch UK
Richard Deeg USA
Gösta Esping-Andersen Spain
Amitai Etzioni USA
Marion Fourcade USA
Peter Hall USA
Kieran Healy USA
Bruce E. Kaufman USA
Christel Lane UK
Patrick Le Galès France
Richard M. Locke USA
Leslie McCall USA
Cathie Jo Martin USA
Yoshitaka Okada Japan
Jacqueline O’Reilly UK
Mary O’Sullivan USA
Bruno Palier France
Monica Prasad USA
Marino Regini Italy
Margaret Ramsey Somers USA
David Stark USA
Robin Stryker USA
Richard Swedberg USA
Brigitte Unger The Netherlands
Bruce Western USA
Joshua Whitford USA
Erik Olin Wright USA
Kathrin Zippel USA

 


Copyright © 2014 武汉大学图书馆 版权所有