期刊名称：HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRY
|
ISSN： | 0957-154X
|
|
出版频率： | Quarterly
|
|
出版社： | SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD, 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON, ENGLAND, EC1Y 1SP
|
|
出版社网址： | http://www.sagepub.co.uk/
|
|
期刊网址： | http://www.sagepub.co.uk/journal.aspx?pid=105576
|
|
影响因子： |
0.419 (2020年)
0.500(2018年)
0.641(2017年)
0.254(2016年)
0.415(2015年)
0.328(2014年)
0.493(2013年)
0.582 (2012年)
0.259(2011年)
|
| 主题范畴： | HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES; PSYCHIATRY |
 期刊简介(About the journal)
投稿须知(Instructions to Authors)
编辑部信息(Editorial Board)
About the journal
History of Psychiatry publishes research articles, analysis and information across the entire field of history of mental illness and the forms of medicine, psychiatry, cultural response and social policy which have evolved to understand and treat it. It covers all periods of history up to the present day, and all nations and cultures.
Widely Cited
ISI Journal Citation Reports Ranking 2004: 5/16 (History of Social Sciences) 69/76 (Psychiatry)
ISI Journal Citation Reports
Ranking 2004 Social Science Edition: 5/16 (History of Social Sciences) 69/76 (Psychiatry) Impact Factor 0.467
Electronic Access:
History of Psychiatry is available electronically on SAGE Journals Online at http://hpy.sagepub.com
Instructions to Authors
PAPERS should be submitted to Dr German E. Berrios, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital (Box 189), Hills Rd, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK. The length of a paper should not be more than 10,000 words, including notes and references; in very special circumstances a longer paper may be considered, but it should be submitted as two parts. Typescripts should be submitted in triplicate, clearly printed in double spacing on one side of the paper only, using A4 (21.0 29.7cm), together with a file of the paper on a DOS-FORMATTED 3.5-inch diskette (if an uncommon word processing package is used, the file should be in UNFORMATTED-TEXT-ONLY form). Authors should keep a copy of the typescript for the correction of proofs.
CLASSIC TEXT. Authors may submit candidate typescripts.
(1) Together, the introduction and the text should not be more than 10,000 words.
(2) The introduction should: (a) justify why the translated paper is considered as classic or seminal; and (b) contextualize the translation historically, that is, provide biographical details on the author and information on the contemporary issues and debates that led the author to write the paper in question. Classic papers should be chosen on the basis of having illuminated their own historical period rather than as being 'forerunners' of current clinical categories or issues.
(3) The original formatting (paragraphs, headings and references, etc.) of the classical text must be changed as little as possible. The accompanying scholarly apparatus should include a justification for any change, together with clarifications, historical notes, references and translational difficulties. To help the reader to make up his/her own mind, it is advisable to add the problematic terms in brackets.
(4) Copyright regulations must be respected. Papers whose authors have died 70 or more years ago are usually free from copyright. If the journal in which the article first appeared is extant, it is advisable to ask permission from the journal editor. Any fees or charges levied by the journal must be borne by the translator.
TITLE PAGE of a paper should include the title, the author's name and affiliation, the address to which proofs are to be sent, and e-mail address. History of Psychiatry uses blind reviews. To facilitate this, the author is requested to ensure that the manuscript, apart from the title page, contains no clue to identity, and that the first page of the manuscript is headed with the paper's title but no other identification.
TITLES should be so worded that the first part may be used as a running headline (maximum length 40 characters including spaces), or alternatively an abbreviated title of the same length may be given.
ABSTRACT. An abstract of the paper in not more than 120 words, and five keywords in alphabetical order, should be typed out on a seperate sheet.
ENDNOTES & REFERENCES. ENDNOTES should be typed double spaced, starting on a new page. Number them consecutively with Arabic numbers. In the text, give citations by superscript numbers only. Reference style for book, chapter from a book, journal article, respectively:
Semerano, Giovanni (2001). L'Infinito: un equivoco millenario. Le antiche civilt¨¤ del Vicino Oriente e le origini del pensiero greco (Paravia: Bruno Mondadori).
Chalmers, D. (1999). Is there synonymy in Ockham's mental language? In P. V. Spade (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ockham (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 53-75.
Genshiro, H. (2002). Japanese psychiatry in the Edo period (1600-1868). History of Psychiatry, 13 (2), 131-51. (Note that a book title in English uses capitals on nouns; the last reference includes full title of journal, Arabic volume number, first and last page of the article.) Pagination references and dates should use the least number of figures possible: 1941-3, 176-92 but 114-18 (not 114-8) REFERENCES in both the text and endnotes should follow Harvard style whereby references should be cited in the text as (author; date: page), and give full details of publications in the reference list. This (unnumbered) list should be typed double spaced, starting on a new page; arrange publications in alphabetical order of author's surname. The style is as given above. Note that for each reference the first line starts at the left margin and any subsequent lines are indented.
STYLE
(1) Single quotes are used except for quotes within quotes, when double quotes are used.
(2) Dates are to be stated as, e.g. 21 July 1876.
(3) Centuries spelt out in full: tenth century, not 10th century.
(4) Dr, Mr, Dept (without full stop, since the last letter of the abbreviation is the last letter of the word). But Prof., Capt..
(5) (5) Foreign words underlined unless assimilated into English (such as e.g., i.e., but et al., op. cit.).
PICTURES. When important to the paper, up to three pictures can be submitted. Each should be supplied as a good quality print, or sent as an eps, jpeg or tiff file (minimum resolution 300 dpi) on the diskette with the text file.
CORRECTIONS to proofs, other than of printer's errors, may be charged to the author.
Guidance Notes for Book Reviewers
We request reviewers to bear the following in mind when writing book reviews for History of Psychiatry.
Invitations to review
Reviewers will be invited to review a publication via email or post. On receipt of the reviewer's acceptance, the reviews editor(s) will dispatch a copy of the publication for review. Prospective reviewers are also encouraged to suggest to the reviews editor(s) specific books they might like to review, and to state areas of expertise. Reviewers may also be asked/ask to review two or more books concurrently, when close connections exist between publications.
Length of review
The standard review a reviewer will be asked for is 500-600 words. But a reviewer may be asked to write a longer essay review of 1000-2000 words. Please abide by the agreed word limit.
Submission of typescripts
All reviews must be letter-quality printed or typed, double-spaced, on A4 or 8x11 paper, with ample margins, with an identical floppy disk/email file attachment version (preferably in Word for Windows, or a compatible word-processing software package). The reviewer is responsible for ensuring that the final hard copy and disk versions of the manuscript are identical. Two hard copies of each typescript should be sent to Jonathan Andrews or Allan Beveridge (at the addresses below), including a statement of the review's word length, including footnotes. Neither the editors (on behalf of History of Psychiatry) nor the publisher accept responsibility for the views of reviewers as presented in their contributions. Reviewers should not submit reviews that have been published or are under consideration for publication elsewhere. Confirmation of the review's originality and unpublished nature will be required in the form of a publishing agreement or copyright assignment, which the reviewer will be sent, and asked to complete and post to the publisher (SAGE). Publication of the review is subject to signature of this publishing agreement. The editors hope to publish reviews as soon as possible after accepting them. However, publication of a review in any specific issue of the journal cannot be guaranteed. The review editor reserves the right to make minor editorial changes to the submitted text, but substantive alterations will be made only in consultation with the reviewer. Proofs of reviews will be supplied to reviewers for checking.
Reviews should (unless otherwise stated) be submitted within 3 months of reviewers receiving review copies of publications. Reviewers are expected to contact the reviews editors in the event of a delay submitting a review. Reviewers are also reminded that authors would normally expect to see a review in print within a year of publication.
Dr Jonathan Andrews, Senior Lecturer, History Department, Oxford Brookes University, Gipsy Lane, Headington,
Oxford OX3 0BP, England jandrews@brookes.ac.uk
Dr Allan Beveridge, Consultant Psychiatrist, Queen Margaret Hospital, Whitefield Road, Dunfermline KY12 0SU, Scotland
Allan.Beveridge@faht.scot.nhs.uk
Preparation of manuscript
The heading of a review should be in the following format:
title of book under review, author, name of publisher, place of publication (including state if USA), year of publication, number of pages, number of illustrations (if any), cover price, ISBN (hbk and pbk if available).
Examples: for books;
Jonathan Andrews and Andrew Scull. Undertaker of the Mind: John Monro and Mad-Doctoring in Eighteenth-century England. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2001. Pp. xxii + 364. 22.95. ISBN 0-520-23151-1.
Johan A. Schioldann. The Lange Theory of 'Periodical Depressions'. A Landmark in the History of Lithium Therapy. Adelaide: Adelaide Academic Press, 2001. Pp. 200. AU$35.00. ISBN 0-9578585-0-7.
For edited collections:
Jonathan Andrews and Anne Digby (eds). Sex and Seclusion, Class and Custody: Perspectives on Gender and Class in the History of British and Irish Psychiatry. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2004. Pp. etc.
For editions of primary texts:
John Haslam. Illustrations of Madness, edited by Roy Porter. London and New York: Routledge, 1988. Pp. etc.
Reviewers should supply their name, title, institutional affiliation, full postal address, email, phone and fax numbers at the end of the typescript, and before the references, and different address for proofs or offprints, if relevant.
e.g.
MICHAEL MACDONALD
University of Michigan, USA
etc.
Style and Presentation
Quotation marks should be single and not double unless they indicate a quotation within a quotation. All figures up to and including ten should be given as words, all above ten in numbers, except where a series is given. Thus '8 sheep, 12 horses and 36 goats'. Use the following: 'eighteenth century' (not '18th century'); 'eighteenth-century doctors' (not '18th/eighteenth century doctors'); '1930s' (not '1930's'); 'per annum' and 'per cent' 1852-72 (not 1852-1872). In general, when referring to numbers in sequence, use the shortest form: thus 101-7, 151-7; note exceptions, 10-13, 11-17. The review should be printed in one font only and in a uniform font size, no less than 12 point. Print facilities such as bold should be avoided (except in the case of headings).
Content
Reviews should generally comment on the following issues:-
1) the importance of the book's contribution to existing historiography and methodologies in the field and how significantly it adjusts our existing knowledge
2) the scholarly standards achieved by the book, including issues of historical and factual accuracy
3) the distinctiveness, originality and breadth of the book
4) the contents of the book in broad terms
5) the book's readability/stylistic qualities
6) the importance/utility of the book for different audiences, especially historians of psychiatry and clinicians, but also for historians in general and those outside of the field
7) the utility or importance of the book as a source of reference or undergraduate textbook (where appropriate)
8) the intellectual and structural coherence and representativeness of the book (especially if an edited collection of essays)
9) the usefulness of the book to scholars, and the special insights it offers on aspects of the history of psychiatry (especially if a primary source or collection of primary sources)
10) any other particular strengths or limitations of the book as perceived by the reviewer
Avoid personal and other comments that are not adequately substantiated or might be deemed libellous and unpublishable.
Notes/References
Endnotes or additional references to be kept to an absolute minimum (especially in shorter reviews). If they are essential, they should follow the format prescribed for full-length articles for the journal. More extensive references will only be permitted in essay reviews. These must be given in Harvard style (see below, and Notes for Contributors). Endnotes must be numbered consecutively throughout the review, and typed double spaced at the end of the article.
Publication details in notes should be given in the following format, with a uniform hanging indent:
Andrews, Jonathan and Scull, Andrew (2001) Undertaker of the Mind: John Monro
and Mad-Doctoring in Eighteenth-century England (Berkeley and Los Angeles:
University of California Press).
Moran, James E. (2003) The signal and the noise: the historical epidemiology of
insanity in ante-bellum New Jersey. History of Psychiatry, 14, 281-301.
Offprints
Reviewers will receive 5 offprints of their review from the publishers.
Authors of review essays will receive 25 offprints and a copy of the journal.
Editorial Board
Editor
G E Berrios ,University of Cambridge, UK
Assistant Editors
Dominic Beer ,London, UK
Allan Beveridge ,Queen Margaret Hospital, Dunfermline, Scotland
C. S. Breathnach ,Department of Human Anatomy & Physiology, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
Tom Dening ,Fulbourn Hospital, Cambridge, UK
Hugh Freeman ,Emeritus Editor, British Journal of Psychiatry, UK
Editorial Advisory Board
Jonathan Andrews ,Oxford Brookes University, UK
Joel Braslow ,Mental Health Services Research Center, Los Angeles, USA
W. F. Bynum ,London, UK
Ian Dowbiggin ,History Department, University of PEI, Canada
Eric. J. Engstrom ,Institute for the History of Medicine, Humboldt University, Germany
Waltraud Ernst, PhD, Deipl-Psych ,Department of History, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Esther Fischer-Homberger ,Bern, Switzerland
John Forrester ,University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Filiberto Fuentenebro ,Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Jean Garrabe ,L'Evolution Psychiatrique
Sander L. Gillman ,University of Illinois, Chicago, USA
Tilmann Habermas ,J.W.Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
Anne Harrington ,Harvard University, Cambridge, USA
Toshihiko Hamanaka ,Nagoya, Japan
David Healy ,North Wales Department of Psychological Medicine, Bangor, Wales, UK
Paul Hoff ,University of Zurich, Switzerland
Rafael Huertas ,CSIC, Madrid, Spain
George J. Makari, MD ,Weill Medical College of Cornell University, Ithaca, USA
Mark S. Micale ,University of Illinois, Urbana, USA
Volker Roelke ,Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany
Elizabeth Roudinesco ,Paris, France
G S Rousseau ,University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Andrew Scull ,University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
Trevor Turner ,London, UK
Matthias M. Weber ,Max-Planck-Institut f¨¹r Psychiatrie, M¨¹nchen, Germany
Charles Webster ,All Souls College, Oxford, UK
David Wright ,McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
Book Reviews Editor
Jonathan Andrews ,Oxford Brookes University, UK
Assistant Book Reviews Editor
Allan Beveridge ,Queen Margaret Hospital, Dunfermline, Scotland
|
字顺( Alphabetical List of Journals):
返回页首 