A|B|C|D|E|F|G|H|I|J|K|L|M|N|O|P|Q|R|S|T|U|V|W|X|Y|Z|ALL

检 索： 期刊全称 刊名关键词 ISSN         高级检索

期刊名称：ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE Quarterly ISSN： 0001-8392 出版频率： Quarterly 出版社： SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC, 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, USA, CA, 91320   出版社网址： http://asq.sagepub.com/ 期刊网址： http://www.uk.sagepub.com/journalsProdDesc.nav?prodId=Journal202065&ct_p=title&crossRegion=asia 影响因子： 5.316(2015年) 3.333(2014年) 4.182 (2012年) 4.212(2011年) 主题范畴： BUSINESS;    MANAGEMENT 期刊简介(About the journal)    投稿须知(Instructions to Authors)    编辑部信息(Editorial Board)    About the journal Administrative Science Quarterly, owned and managed by the Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management at Cornell University, is a top-ranked, quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that publishes the best theoretical and empirical papers on organizational studies from dissertations and the evolving, new work of more established scholars, as well as interdisciplinary work in organizational theory, and informative book reviews. Abstracting/Indexing:  Academic ASAP  Academic OneFile - Gale  Business & Company Profile ASAP (Gale)  Business and Company Resource Center - Gale  Business ASAP - Gale  Business ASAP International - Gale  Business Source Complete  Business Source Corporate  Business Source Elite  Business Source Premier  CSA Worldwide Political Science Abstracts  Dietrich's Index Philosophicus  Educator's Reference Complete (Gale)  Expanded Academic ASAP  General Business File ASAP - Gale  General OneFile - Gale  General Reference Center Gold - Gale  General Reference Centre International  IBZ (International Bibliography of Periodical Literature on the  Humanities and Social Sciences)  InfoTrac Custom - Gale/Cengage Learning  InfoTrac Custom Journals (Gale)  International Bibliography of the Social Sciences  PAIS International  PsycFIRST  PsycINFO  Social Sciences Citation Index (Web of Science)  Social Sciences Index Full Text  Social Services Abstracts  SocINDEX - EBSCO  Sociological Abstracts  Student Resource Center College (w/ Academic ASAP)  Student Resource Center College (w/ Expanded Academic ASAP)   Instructions to Authors Notice to Contributors The ASQ logo reads, "Dedicated to advancing the understanding of administration through empirical investigation and theoretical analysis." The editors interpret that statement to contain three components that affect editorial decisions. About any manuscript they ask: does this work to (1) advance understanding, (2) address administration, (3) have mutual relevance for empirical investigation and theoretical analysis? Theory is how we move to further research and improved practice. If manuscripts contain no theory, their value is suspect. Ungrounded theory, however, is no more helpful than are atheoretical data. We are receptive to multiple forms of grounding but not to a complete avoidance of grounding. Normal science, replication, synthesis, and systematic extension are all appropriate submissions for ASQ, but people submitting such work should articulate what has been learned that we did not know before. That it has been done before is no reason that it should be done again. There are topics within organizational studies that have become stagnant, repetitious, and closed. Standard work that simply repeats the blind spots of the past does not advance understanding even though work like it has been published before. ASQ asks: "What's interesting here?" But we take pains not to confuse interesting work with work that contains mere novelties, clever turns of phrase, or other substitutes for insight. We try to identify those ideas that disconfirm assumptions by people who do and study administration. Building a coherent, cumulative body of knowledge typically requires work that suggests syntheses, themes, causal sequences, patterns, and propositions that people have not seen before. Interesting work should accelerate development. We attach no priorities to subjects for study, nor do we attach greater significance to one methodological style than another. For these reasons, we view all our papers as high-quality contributions to the literature and present them as equals to our readers. The first paper in each issue is not viewed by the editors as the best of those appearing in the issue. Our readers will decide for themselves which of the papers are exceptionally valuable. We refrain from listing explicit topics in which we are interested. ASQ should publish things the editors have never thought of, and we encourage that by being vague about preferences. Authors should look at what ASQ has published over the last 10 years, see if there are any precedents for the proposed submission, and, if there is even a glimmer of precedent, submit the work to ASQ. Manuscripts that are inappropriate will be returned promptly. We are interested in compact presentations of theory and research, suspecting that very long manuscripts contain an unclear line of argument, multiple arguments, or no argument at all. Each manuscript should contain one key point, which the author should be able to state in one sentence. Digressions from one key point are common when authors cite more literature than is necessary to frame and justify an argument. We are interested in good writing and use poor writing as a reason to reject manuscripts. We're looking for manuscripts that are well argued and well written. By well argued we mean that the argument is clear and logical; by well written we mean that the argument is accessible and well phrased. Clear writing is not an adornment but a basic proof of grasp. The basic flaw common to rejected manuscripts is that authors are unable to evaluate critically their own work and seem to make insufficient use of colleagues before the work is submitted. All work has alternative explanations. All work contains flaws. The best way to recognize flaws is to discard the discussion section, ask what was learned and what is wrong with it, and frame the discussion in terms of these discoveries. To do this is to anticipate reviewers and improve the probability of acceptance. Preparation of Manuscripts We encourage electronic submissions. Attach a file with the manuscript, which must be in a Word 6.0/95-compatible format, to an e-mail message and send it to asq-submit@johnson.cornell.edu. The attached file must include all figures and tables. Include in the e-mail message the title of the manuscript, authors' names, and the e-mail and postal addresses of the corresponding author. The manuscript itself must include a title page with all of the authors' affiliations and contact information. In addition, type the title on the abstract page so that the title page can be removed to preserve the authors' anonymity. Authors without access to e-mail may send an IBM-formatted floppy disk or CD-ROM addressed to the Editor, ASQ, The Johnson School at Cornell University, 130 East Seneca Street, Suite 400,Ithaca, NY 14850-4353. Use the following guidelines to prepare manuscripts: Include an informative 100-word abstract that describes the material presented in the paper, including the question or focus, the type of study reported (e.g., empirical, laboratory, qualitative, field study, etc.), the context (e.g., work groups, Fortune 500 firms, hospitals, cooperatives, etc.), and the major findings. For examples, see abstracts of published work on the ASQ web page (http://www.johnson.cornell.edu/publications/ASQ). Type all copy, except tables, double-spaced in 12-point type. Type in block form, with an extra double-space between paragraphs. Use footnotes sparingly. Essential material should be incorporated in the text; material with weak relevance should be deleted. Organize the manuscript by using primary, secondary, and tertiary headings (see a recent issue of ASQ for format), rather than numbered headings. To preserve anonymity in the blind-review process, authors should avoid revealing their identity in text, through obvious self-references to previous work, or in footnotes. If authors cite their own published work or work in progress, however, these references must be included in the references with full bibliographic information. Authors should reference their own work as they would the work of any other scholar. Reviewers will ask what the contribution of a manuscript is above what has already been published and must have this information. Omit italics unless absolutely necessary. Use only abbreviations known to the general public and avoid unnecessary acronyms; spell out an abbreviated term when first used. Avoid parentheses in textual material. Use quotation marks only for direct quotations. Spell out numbers from one to nine and those that begin a sentence. Write out "percent" in text; use percentage sign in tables. Type tables or figures each on separate pages and attach them at the end of the manuscript after the references, rather than inserting them in the text. Include a note (i.e., Insert table 1 about here) at the point in text where they are referenced. Present graphic material so that the meaning is immediately clear by including a title on every figure and table and labeling axes and diagrams. Use the active voice whenever possible, but use "we" only for multiple authors. Use the past tense for discussing earlier studies or presenting methods, samples, data, findings, results, and conclusions. Use the present tense for discussing tables or figures as they are presented in text. Define a term accurately when it is first used and use it consistently with that meaning throughout. Find the best way to express an idea once, rather than repeating the same idea in different words. Do not use a clause where a phrase will do or a phrase where a word will do. Avoid jargon; do not mistake it for technical terminology. References. Discuss only literature that pertains directly to the thesis or research of the paper and make it clear how it relates. Cite a representative set of references when there is a large literature. References to articles, books, and other source works should be cited in the text by noting in parentheses the last name of the author, the year of publication, and page numbers where appropriate. Do not use "ibid.," "op. cit.," or "loc. cit."; specify subsequent citations of the same source in the same way as the first citation. In the reference section, list every reference cited in the manuscript; do not list a reference that isn't cited in the text. Provide authors' last names and initials, year, title, volume and pages of journals, editors' names and inclusive pages for chapters in edited volumes, and publisher and place of publication for books. Use the following guidelines in citing references: If the author's name is in the text, follow it with the year in parentheses [e.g., "Glaser (1992) recommended . . ."]. If the author's name is not in the text, insert it in parentheses, followed by a comma and the year. Multiple references are listed chronologically in parentheses, separated by semicolons. For two or three authors, give all the authors' last names in text each time the work is cited; if there are four or more authors, give only the first author's name followed by "et al." and the date for each citation. Page numbers, to indicate a passage in a book or to give the source of a quotation, follow the year and are preceded by a colon. If there is more than one reference to the same author in the same year, postscript the date with a, b, c, etc. (e.g., Miller and Friesen, 1980a). For a source that is forthcoming or in press, give an estimated year of publication and use that date for citations in text. Add "in press" or "forthcoming" in parentheses at the end of the bibliographic information in the references. List all references as an appendix to the manuscript. Alphabetize by author and, for each author, list in chronological sequence. List the authors' last names and initials. Use no italics or abbreviations. Use one tab between the date and the title. See examples: Example References Burt, R. S. 2000 "The network structure of social capital." In B. M. Staw and R. I. Sutton (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 22: 345-423. New York: Elsevier/JAI. Davis, G. F. 1993 "Who gets ahead in the market for corporate directors?' Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, Atlanta, GA. Glaser, B. 1992 Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press. Kenny, D. A. 1998 "Multiple factor models." http://davidakenny.net/cm/mfa.ctor.htm. Miller, D., and P. Friesen 1980a "Archetypes of organizational transitions." Administrative Science Quarterly, 25: 268-299. 1980b "Momentum and revolution in organizational adaptation." Academy of Management Journal, 22: 591-614. Tolbert, P. S., and L. G. Zucker 1996 "The institutionalization of institutional theory." In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, and W. R. Nord (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Studies: 175-190. London: Sage.   Editorial Board Managing Editor: Linda Johanson Cornell University, USA Associate Managing Editor: Joan Friedman Cornell University, USA Associate Editors: Mary Benner University of Minnesota, USA Henrich R. Greve INSEAD, Singapore Mauro F. Guillén University of Pennsylvania, USA P. Devereaux Jennings University of Alberta, Canada Martin Kilduff University College London, UK Michael G. Pratt Boston College, USA Pamela S. Tolbert Cornell University, USA John Wagner Michigan State University Book Review Editor: Wesley Sine Cornell University, USA Editorial Board: Ramon J. Aldag University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA Michel Anteby Harvard University, USA Pino Audia Dartmouth College, USA Julie Battilana Harvard University, USA Beth Bechky New York University, USA Christine Beckman University of California, Irvine, USA Matthew Bidwell University of Pennsylvania, USA Emily S. Block University of Notre Dame, USA Anne Bowers University of Toronto, Canada Daniel J. Brass University of Kentucky, USA Forrest Briscoe Pennsylvania State University, USA Joseph Broschak University of Arizona, Tucson, USA M. Diane Burton Cornell University, USA Albert A. Cannella, Jr. Arizona State University Arijit Chatterjee ESSEC, Singapore Ya-Ru Chen Cornell University, USA Lisa Cohen McGill University, Canada Jason A. Colquitt The University of Georgia, USA Stéphane Côté University of Toronto, Canada John Dencker University of Illinois, Champaign, USA James Detert Cornell University, USA Nancy DiTomaso Rutgers University, USA Glen Dowell Cornell University, USA J. P. Eggers New York University, USA Isabel Fernandez-Mateo London Business School, UK Heidi Gardner Harvard University, USA Martin Gargiulo INSEAD, Singapore Marta A. Geletkanycz Boston College, USA Jennifer M. George Rice University, USA Dennis A. Gioia Pennsylvania State University, USA Lindred Greer Stanford University, USA Isin Guler University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA Heather Haveman University of California, Berkeley, UK Exequiel Hernandez University of Pennsylvania, USA Michael Jensen University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA Stefan Jonsson Uppsala University, Sweden John Joseph Duke University, USA Alexandra Kalev Tel Aviv University, Israel Olga Khessina Cornell University, USA Jay Kim INSEAD, Singapore Brayden G. King Northwestern University, USA Adam M. Kleinbaum Dartmouth College, USA Richard J. Klimoski George Mason University, USA Brandon Lee London Business School, UK Michael Lounsbury University of Alberta, Canada Christopher Marquis Harvard University, USA Alexandra Michel University of Pennsylvania, USA Mark S. Mizruchi University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA Siobhan O'Mahony Boston University, USA Jason Owen-Smith University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA Jeffrey Pfeffer Stanford University, USA Madan M. Pillutla London Business School, UK Mikolaj J. Piskorski Harvard University, USA Francisco Polidoro University of Texas, Austin, USA Jeffrey T. Polzer Harvard University, USA Joseph F. Porac New York University, USA Hart Posen University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA Christopher I. Rider Emory University, USA Violina Rindova University of Texas, Austin, USA Nancy Rothbard University of Pennsylvania, USA Marc-David L. Seidel University of British Columbia, Canada Wesley Sine Cornell University, USA Maxim Sytch University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA Paul Tracey University of Cambridge, UK Linda K. Treviño Pennsylvania State University James Wade Emory University, USA James D. Westphal University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA Amy S. Wharton Washington State University, Vancouver Batia M. Wiesenfeld New York University, USA David Zhu Arizona State University, USA