期刊名称:PHILOSOPHY COMPASS
期刊简介(About the journal)
投稿须知(Instructions to Authors)
编辑部信息(Editorial Board)
About the journal
![](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/cms/attachment/89c753e6-850a-407d-b228-f33917702fab/phc3.v14.2.cover.gif)
Overview
Unique in both range and approach, Philosophy Compass is an online-only journal publishing peer-reviewed survey articles of the most important research from and current thinking from across the entire discipline. In an age of hyper-specialization, Philosophy Compass provides an ideal starting point for the non-specialist, offering pointers for researchers, teachers and students alike, to help them find and interpret the best research in the field.
Articles in Philosophy Compass are published under the following sections: Aesthetics | Continental | Epistemology | Ethics | History of Philosophy | Logic & Language | Metaphysics | Mind & Cognitive Science | Naturalistic Philosophy | Philosophy of Science | Philosophy of Religion | Legal & Political Philosophy
Read the Letter from the Editor
Visit www.philosophy-compass.com
For information on other Blackwell Compass Journals visit www.blackwell-compass.com
Aims and Scope
Philosophy Compass is an online-only journal publishing original, peer-reviewed survey articles of the most important research from across the entire discipline. Philosophy Compass fills a gap left by existing guides within the subject by focussing on what is happening right now in philosophy. Providing an ideal starting point for non-specialists, Philosophy Compass publishes well written pieces explaining important debates within all areas of the field. In an age of hyper-specialization, Philosophy Compassprovides pointers for researchers, teachers and students alike, which will help them to look for the best research, and to interpret what they find.
Philosophy Compass... …supports your research with over 100 new articles per year, sourced from an international scholarly community. Gain an introduction to new fields, an overview of unfamiliar topics, and familiarity with the latest scholarship and debate.
…informs your teaching with lively original articles that are quickly and continuously replenished, and supplemented with teaching guides. Philosophy Compass will provide you with up-to-date bibliographies and expert analysis on key themes to inspire and engage your students.
Explore Philosophy Compass for:
-
A new kind of core content: state-of-the-art surveys of current research discuss the major topics, issues, viewpoints, and controversies within each area of the discipline.
-
Coverage of the entire field highlights connections across sub-disciplines of philosophical scholarship
-
Reference-linked bibliographies for each article, providing the ideal entry point into specialist literature
-
100 articles per year: 3 times more than a standard journal
-
Fast continuous publication: articles typically available 6-8 weeks after acceptance and as an online-only journal there are no issue restriction
www.philosophy-compass.com
Abstracting and Indexing Information
- Arts & Humanities Citation Index (Clarivate Analytics)
- Current Contents: Arts & Humanities (Clarivate Analytics)
- Philosopher's Index (Philosopher's Information Center)
- Philosophy Research Index (PDC)
- Research Library (ProQuest)
- Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics)
Instructions to Authors
PREPARING THE SUBMISSION
Parts of the Manuscript The manuscript should be submitted in separate files: title page; main text file; figures.
Title Page The title page should contain: i. A short informative containing the major key words. The title should not contain abbreviations (see Wiley's best practice SEO tips); ii. A short running title of less than 40 characters; iii. The full names of the authors; iv. The author's institutional affiliations, with a footnote for the author’s present address if different from where the work was conducted; v. Acknowledgments.
Authorship Please refer to the journal’s Authorship policy in the Editorial Policies and Ethical Considerations section for details on author listing eligibility.
Acknowledgments Contributions from anyone who does not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed, with permission from the contributor, in an Acknowledgments section. Financial and material support should also be mentioned. Thanks to anonymous reviewers are not appropriate.
Conflict of Interest Statement Authors will be asked to provide a conflict of interest statement during the submission process. For details on what to include in this section, see the ‘Conflict of Interest’ section in the Editorial Policies and Ethical Considerations section below. Submitting authors should ensure they liaise with all co-authors to confirm agreement with the final statement.
Main Text File As papers are double-blind peer reviewed, the main text file should not include any information that might identify the authors.
The main text file should be presented in the following order:
- Title, abstract, and key words;
- Main text;
- References;
- Tables (each table complete with title and footnotes);
- Figure legends;
- Appendices (if relevant).
Figures and supporting information should be supplied as separate files.
Abstract Many students and researchers looking for information online will use search engines such as Google, Yahoo! or similar. By optimizing your title and abstract, you will increase the chance of someone finding it. This in turn will make it more likely to be viewed and/or cited in another work. In order to optimise your abstract, we recommend you:
- Ensure the key phrases for your article’s topic appear in the title and abstract e.g. ‘Generative Metrics’
- Use the same key phrases, if possible, in the title and abstract. Note of caution: unnecessary repetition will result in the page being rejected by search engines, so don't overdo it.
Example of Well-Optimised Title / Abstract Genocide and Holocaust Consciousness in Australia Ever since the British colonists in Australia became aware of the disappearance of the indigenous peoples in the 1830s, they have contrived to excuse themselves by pointing to the effects of disease and displacement. Yet although ‘genocide’ was not a term used in the nineteenth century, ‘extermination’ was, and many colonists called for the extermination of Aborigines when they impeded settlement by offering resistance. Consciousness of genocide was suppressed during the twentieth century – until the later 1960s, when a critical school of historians began serious investigations of frontier violence. Their efforts received official endorsement in the 1990s, but profound cultural barriers prevent the development of a general ‘genocide consciousness’. One of these is ‘Holocaust consciousness’, which is used by conservative and right-wing figures to play down the gravity of what transpired in Australia. These two aspects of Australian public memory are central to the political humanisation of the country. This article appears on the first page of results on Google for ‘holocaust consciousness Australia.’
Poorly Optimized Title / Abstract Australia's Forgotten Victims Ever since the British colonists in Australia became aware of the disappearance of the indigenous peoples in the 1830s, they have contrived to excuse themselves by pointing to the effects of disease and displacement. Many colonists called for the extermination of Aborigines when they impeded settlement by offering resistance, yet there was no widespread public acknowledgement of this as a policy until the later 1960s, when a critical school of historians began serious investigations of frontier violence. Their efforts received official endorsement in the 1990s, but profound cultural barriers prevent the development of a general awareness of this. Conservative and right-wing figures continue to play down the gravity of what transpired. These two aspects of Australian public memory are central to the political humanisation of the country.
Remember:
- People tend to search for specifics, not just one word - e.g. “women's fiction” not 'fiction'. So use key phrases rather than individual words in your article title and abstract.
- Key phrases need to make sense within the title and abstract and flow well.
- It is best to focus on a maximum of three or four different keyword phrases in an abstract rather than try to get across too many points.
- Finally, always check that the abstract reads well - remember the primary audience is still the researcher, not a search engine, so write for readers, not robots.
Keywords Please provide seven keywords.
Main Text
- As papers are double-blind peer reviewed, the main text file should not include any information that might identify the authors.
- The journal uses British/US spelling; however, authors may submit using either option, as spelling of accepted papers is converted during the production process.
References References should be prepared according to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th edition). This means in text citations should follow the author-date method whereby the author's last name and the year of publication for the source should appear in the text, for example, (Jones, 1998). The complete reference list should appear alphabetically by name at the end of the paper.
A sample of the most common entries in reference lists appears below. Please note that a DOI should be provided for all references where available. For more information about APA referencing style, please refer to the APA FAQ. Please note that for journal articles, issue numbers are not included unless each issue in the volume begins with page one.
Journal article Beers, S. R. , & De Bellis, M. D. (2002). Neuropsychological function in children with maltreatment-related posttraumatic stress disorder. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 483–486. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.3.483
Book Bradley-Johnson, S. (1994). Psychoeducational assessment of students who are visually impaired or blind: Infancy through high school (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
Internet Document Norton, R. (2006, November 4). How to train a cat to operate a light switch [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vja83KLQXZs
Tables Tables should be self-contained and complement, not duplicate, information contained in the text. They should be supplied as editable files, not pasted as images. Legends should be concise but comprehensive – the table, legend, and footnotes must be understandable without reference to the text. All abbreviations must be defined in footnotes. Footnote symbols: †, ‡, §, ¶, should be used (in that order) and *, **, *** should be reserved for P-values. Statistical measures such as SD or SEM should be identified in the headings.
Figure Legends Legends should be concise but comprehensive – the figure and its legend must be understandable without reference to the text. Include definitions of any symbols used and define/explain all abbreviations and units of measurement.
Figures Although authors are encouraged to send the highest-quality figures possible, for peer-review purposes, a wide variety of formats, sizes, and resolutions are accepted. Click here for the basic figure requirements for figures submitted with manuscripts for initial peer review, as well as the more detailed post-acceptance figure requirements.
Figures submitted in colour may be reproduced in colour online free of charge. Please note, however, that it is preferable that line figures (e.g. graphs and charts) are supplied in black and white so that they are legible if printed by a reader in black and white. If an author would prefer to have figures printed in colour in hard copies of the journal, a fee will be charged by the Publisher.
Additional Files Appendices Appendices will be published after the references. For submission they should be supplied as separate files but referred to in the text.
Supporting Information Supporting information is information that is not essential to the article, but provides greater depth and background. It is hosted online and appears without editing or typesetting. It may include tables, figures, videos, datasets, etc. Click here for Wiley’s FAQs on supporting information.
Note: if data, scripts, or other artefacts used to generate the analyses presented in the paper are available via a publicly available data repository, authors should include a reference to the location of the material within their paper.
General Style Points The following points provide general advice on formatting and style.
- Abbreviations: In general, terms should not be abbreviated unless they are used repeatedly and the abbreviation is helpful to the reader. Initially, use the word in full, followed by the abbreviation in parentheses. Thereafter use the abbreviation only.
- Units of measurement: Measurements should be given in SI or SI-derived units. Visit the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) website at www.bipm.fr for more information about SI units.
- Numbers: numbers under 10 are spelt out, except for: measurements with a unit (8mmol/l); age (6 weeks old), or lists with other numbers (11 dogs, 9 cats, 4 gerbils).
Editorial Board
Editor-in-Chief Alex Guerrero, Rutgers School of Arts and Sciences, USA
Section Editors
- A.W. Eaton (Aesthetics & Philosophy of Art)
- Karyn Lai (Chinese Comparative Philosophy)
- Andrew Cutrofello (Continental)
- Kenny Easwaran (Epistemology)
- Guy Fletcher (Ethics)
- Sarah Stroud (Ethics)
- Alia Al-Saji (Feminist Philosophy)
- Christopher Shields (History of Philosophy - Ancient)
- Lisa Shapiro (History of Philosophy - Early Modern)
- Michael Blake (Legal & Political)
- Gillian Brock (Legal & Political)
- Robin Jeshion (Logic & Language)
- Carlos Sanchez (Latinx & Latin America)
- Carolina Sartorio (Metaphysics)
- Susanna Schellenberg (Mind & Cognitive Science)
- Michelle Montague (Mind & Cognitive Science)
- Edouard Machery (Naturalistic Philosophy)
- Yujin Nagasawa (Philosophy of Religion)
- Valia Allori (Philosophy of Science)
Editorial Board
Aesthetics & Philosophy of Art Aaron Meskin Sherri Irvin David Davies Stephen Davies Amie Thomasson
Chinese Comparative Philosophy Stephen Angle Carine Defoort Hui-Chieh Loy Franklin Perkins Yuri Pines Eric Schwitzgebel
Continental Nancy Bauer Fred Beiser Peg Birmingham Frithjof Bergmann Taylor Carman Simon Critchley Nancy Fraser Paul Patton Bill Schroeder David Sherman
Epistemology Jonathan Adler David Christensen Richard Feldman Tamar Szabo Gendler Robin Jeshion Ram Neta Duncan Pritchard
Ethics Andrew Altman Julia Driver Lori Gruen Larry May Valerie Tiberius Russ Shafer-Landau Mark Timmons Christopher ("Kit") Heath Wellman Jonathan Jacobs
History of Philosophy Tyler Burge Stewart Candlish Don Garrett Richard Heck Michael Kremer James Levine Robert Pasnau Alan Nelson Michael Potter Elizabeth Radcliffe Thomas Ricketts Donald Rutherford Mark Sainsbury Peter Simons Peter Sullivan Jamie Tappenden Gideon Yaffe
Legal & Political Jeffrey Goldsworthy Charles Mills David Owen Bert van den Brink Wil Waluchow Daniel Weinstock Gillian Brock Colin Macleod
Logic & Language JC Beall David Braun Delia Fara (formerly Graff) Manuel García-Carpintero Francois Recanati Genoveva Marti Barry Smith
Metaphysics John Divers Thomas Hofweber Daniel Nolan Eric Olson Andre Gallois Jonathan Schaffer Hud Hudson Ned Markosian
Mind & Cognitive Science Terry Horgan David Chalmers Carolyn Korsmeyer David Papineau Alex Byrne Ned Block Joseph Levine Tim Crane Robert van Gulick Jose Bermudez Brie Gertler
Naturalistic Philosophy Adina Roskies Jonathan Weinberg Jesse Prinz Gil Harman Stephen Stich Jonathan Cohen Hilary Kornblith John Doris
Philosophy of Religion Jerome Gellman Timothy Chappell Mark Wynn Paul Draper Brian Leftow Warren Shrader Paul Moser Graham Oppy John Schellenberg Jeffrey Koperski Stewart Goetz Victoria Harrison Charles Taliaferro Klaas Kray David Cheetham
Philosophy of Science Barry Loewer Robert Skipper Nick Huggett Richard Bradley Michael Strevens Stephan Hartmann Paul Teller Jeff Barrett Andrea Wood
|